He is meeting with the Tea Party several times a week planning his run to be Michigans next governor and appears to have been deeply invovled with them for the last year or more.
Is it what MI needs a Tea Party Governor?|||No, the Tea Party protestors have no ultimate leader.|||Never heard of Pete Hoeskstra until today.
Considering Michigan is bankrupt, a Tea Party- fiscally Responsible candidate is exactly what MI needs.|||I think it's past your bedtime.
Friday, December 2, 2011
In the last uk election, would you have voted for labour if gordon brown had been labour party leader?
Im staunch Tory so I wouldn't vote for any Labour scum, however in a way Labourites did vote for Brown as they did know full well that it was only a matter of time before Blair was going to stand aside and **** hole Brown was going to take over, so the voters did really know what they were getting. I just dont think they knew as did anyone, the hell that he would cause for the decent folk of Britain and his sheer incompetence!!|||No !I would not have voted for the Labour Party if Gordon Brown had been leader.
He has proved to be an ineffective, weak easily led by Peter Mandelson.
He has also proved that he lacks ability in his much heralded strong point finance;Where he had the opportunity to place safeguards into the Banking system which would have prevented millions of pensioners savings hitting 'rock bottom'.
It has been the poor pensioner and the thrifty who have paid the full price for Gordon Brown's political ineptitude and low ability rating.
Gordon Brown is a low calibre politician who has been propelled to the top by selfish Labour time servers mostly from Scotland who demand top political jobs in return for their questionable loyalty.|||No and my household will not be voting Labour so long as GB remains their leader. It's their problem, they've been in govrernment for nearly 100 years and in all that time have done nothing for the Common People. Their main claim to fame is fiddling expenses and demanding vast sums of money to help change the laws of UK on behalf of rich business clients.
Anne Widecombe MP (Ultra Right Wing Tory, ban fishing etc) (leaving the Commons at this election) told a TV news crew that "the people think we do not listen to them." Right lady, you do NOT listen to us. The entire House of Commons is just a self congratulatory waffle shop with no plans ever to deal with any of the issues which concern the Common People.
Gordon Brown has dipped into the pension funds of the Common People and stolen our money. His aim is to make as many people as possible poor in the hope that this will encourage them to carry on voting Labour. Not even when I'm dead Gordon, will you get my vote.
Gordon Brine also has plans to take the family properties of millions of our elder citizens in exchange for Third World Class healthcare in their last years. The elders of our families will have to hand over all their property, houses, gold ornaments and other family treasures to the Brine Government Department of Dirty Tricks. This money will then be used to support the Champagne Socialist lifestyle of Labour Party MPs none of whom have ever done a days work in their lives and who on the whole come from rich lawyer families who have no idea what it's like to work seven days week for a miserable pittance.
rant done. . .feeeeel sooo much better
GORDIN BRINE MUST GO.
P.S. What's that Evil Satanic worshipper Tiny Blur doing? Remember him? Took us into an illegal war in both Iraq (now a bombed out total lawless Hell hole - the Gateway to Hell) and then into another illagal war in Afghanistan while posing at the Bush "Poodle of the Year Show."
Tiny Blur and his kind should read history before ever getting involved in such as Afghanistan.
The link below tells the story of a Scottish soldier fighting in Afghanistan in the 19th C - but did Blurite learn? No - he went ahead just the same, in the hope of gaining control of what really amounts to the SILK ROUTE - the East-West trade route link.
http://www.internet-promotions.co.uk/arc鈥?/a>|||NO WAY MAN, he only got the job because he was chancellor, the old pals act its BS, and anyway Brown is scottish, (thats why he was good with fiscal policy, Aye) it's absurd.
That said, even if he is not the man for the job, he has to better than any right wing neo Nazi Fascist Tory Bastards, they are so out of touch, now they are even picking on gays,
smell the coffee bro's its been legal for decades, pathetic, I pray to god they dont get into power,
PS I'm not gay just saying thats all.
And if I had known what Tony Blair was going to do (iraq war) I would not have voted for him either, that said i think he as been one of the most successful labour party leaders ever (and Prime minister), he is one smart cookie, and I still like him but I dont like war.
I will still vote labour even if brown is a **** just to keep them blue bastards out,
POWER TO THE PEOPLE (WOLFIE SMITH) HAHA|||I would have been very undecided. It was on the back of some good achievements like recognising civil partnerships legally and also the economy was going quite well too. It is the Lisbon stuff, the increasing political correctness, the disturbing immigration etc that has really turned me off. I didn't see them for what they really are back then.
I would have been torn, but now would I vote Labour? Not a chance.|||I'd be voting for my local MP and on the basis that they represent the party that reflects the society, values and priorities I'd like to see a government have. I therefore vote for the party not their current leader.
We seem to be moving closer to personality based presidential style elections in this country which while good for the media is not good for democracy.
However I live in a safe Tory seat with the Lib dems as the second party which would essentially make a vote for Labour a wasted vote. To make voting more meaningful I'd like to see us change the "first past the post system" and introduce a form of "proportional representation." Hopefully this will come out of what is likely to be a hung parliament and will lead to real cross party debate on how we solve the key issues facing us of: a) Government/Taxpayer debt and what, when and how cuts to public spending are made b) how consumer debt is reduced c) changing the basis of our economy to re-balance our trade so we generate income rather than sending all our earnings overseas to buy goods - often on credit cards - manufactured in countries where labour is cheap and d) the pensions time bomb.|||No. Gordon Brown should go and live in the Asian subcontinent or Africa instead of bringing millions of Asians and Africans to the UK.
In secret, he brought 3,000,000 immigrants to the UK between 1999 and 2008, nobody knew about it, we gradually found about it when London looked like an African or Asian capital complete with burkas
We have almost lost our country thanks to Brown Gordon|||Look up the definition of the word ''Incompetence'' there is a picture of Gordon Brown next to it!
Also if you look up the word definition for ''Lying Scum'' it says 'New Labour, ie...Lord Mandleson.|||I didn't vote for Lab-Con or Lib-dems, I voted for the only party who had any sense, UKIP the only party that would bring Britain out of the EU.|||Well, at the last election everybody knew Gordon Brown would be Prime Minister as Tony Blair said he would quit, so bearing that in mind, it just shows how short everyone's memories are.|||never voted for labour and I somehow dont think that Gordon Brown will convince me to do otherwise.
To use an old ad slogan "labour isn't working".|||No - if i was a Liebour supporter , i would have preferred someone slightly less dishonest but i can't think of anyone!|||Nope - I would never vote Labour. They are incompetent.|||Nope, when he got announced as the next PM i cringed, i knew what he'd be like from day one.|||No.|||Not a snowball's chance in hell.|||No. not while there is a hole in his ars-|||I'm an advocate of Tory Democracy so I would never vote for Labour, but I am voting for the Liberal Democrats this time round (I'm not putting my X next to James Gray).
He has proved to be an ineffective, weak easily led by Peter Mandelson.
He has also proved that he lacks ability in his much heralded strong point finance;Where he had the opportunity to place safeguards into the Banking system which would have prevented millions of pensioners savings hitting 'rock bottom'.
It has been the poor pensioner and the thrifty who have paid the full price for Gordon Brown's political ineptitude and low ability rating.
Gordon Brown is a low calibre politician who has been propelled to the top by selfish Labour time servers mostly from Scotland who demand top political jobs in return for their questionable loyalty.|||No and my household will not be voting Labour so long as GB remains their leader. It's their problem, they've been in govrernment for nearly 100 years and in all that time have done nothing for the Common People. Their main claim to fame is fiddling expenses and demanding vast sums of money to help change the laws of UK on behalf of rich business clients.
Anne Widecombe MP (Ultra Right Wing Tory, ban fishing etc) (leaving the Commons at this election) told a TV news crew that "the people think we do not listen to them." Right lady, you do NOT listen to us. The entire House of Commons is just a self congratulatory waffle shop with no plans ever to deal with any of the issues which concern the Common People.
Gordon Brown has dipped into the pension funds of the Common People and stolen our money. His aim is to make as many people as possible poor in the hope that this will encourage them to carry on voting Labour. Not even when I'm dead Gordon, will you get my vote.
Gordon Brine also has plans to take the family properties of millions of our elder citizens in exchange for Third World Class healthcare in their last years. The elders of our families will have to hand over all their property, houses, gold ornaments and other family treasures to the Brine Government Department of Dirty Tricks. This money will then be used to support the Champagne Socialist lifestyle of Labour Party MPs none of whom have ever done a days work in their lives and who on the whole come from rich lawyer families who have no idea what it's like to work seven days week for a miserable pittance.
rant done. . .feeeeel sooo much better
GORDIN BRINE MUST GO.
P.S. What's that Evil Satanic worshipper Tiny Blur doing? Remember him? Took us into an illegal war in both Iraq (now a bombed out total lawless Hell hole - the Gateway to Hell) and then into another illagal war in Afghanistan while posing at the Bush "Poodle of the Year Show."
Tiny Blur and his kind should read history before ever getting involved in such as Afghanistan.
The link below tells the story of a Scottish soldier fighting in Afghanistan in the 19th C - but did Blurite learn? No - he went ahead just the same, in the hope of gaining control of what really amounts to the SILK ROUTE - the East-West trade route link.
http://www.internet-promotions.co.uk/arc鈥?/a>|||NO WAY MAN, he only got the job because he was chancellor, the old pals act its BS, and anyway Brown is scottish, (thats why he was good with fiscal policy, Aye) it's absurd.
That said, even if he is not the man for the job, he has to better than any right wing neo Nazi Fascist Tory Bastards, they are so out of touch, now they are even picking on gays,
smell the coffee bro's its been legal for decades, pathetic, I pray to god they dont get into power,
PS I'm not gay just saying thats all.
And if I had known what Tony Blair was going to do (iraq war) I would not have voted for him either, that said i think he as been one of the most successful labour party leaders ever (and Prime minister), he is one smart cookie, and I still like him but I dont like war.
I will still vote labour even if brown is a **** just to keep them blue bastards out,
POWER TO THE PEOPLE (WOLFIE SMITH) HAHA|||I would have been very undecided. It was on the back of some good achievements like recognising civil partnerships legally and also the economy was going quite well too. It is the Lisbon stuff, the increasing political correctness, the disturbing immigration etc that has really turned me off. I didn't see them for what they really are back then.
I would have been torn, but now would I vote Labour? Not a chance.|||I'd be voting for my local MP and on the basis that they represent the party that reflects the society, values and priorities I'd like to see a government have. I therefore vote for the party not their current leader.
We seem to be moving closer to personality based presidential style elections in this country which while good for the media is not good for democracy.
However I live in a safe Tory seat with the Lib dems as the second party which would essentially make a vote for Labour a wasted vote. To make voting more meaningful I'd like to see us change the "first past the post system" and introduce a form of "proportional representation." Hopefully this will come out of what is likely to be a hung parliament and will lead to real cross party debate on how we solve the key issues facing us of: a) Government/Taxpayer debt and what, when and how cuts to public spending are made b) how consumer debt is reduced c) changing the basis of our economy to re-balance our trade so we generate income rather than sending all our earnings overseas to buy goods - often on credit cards - manufactured in countries where labour is cheap and d) the pensions time bomb.|||No. Gordon Brown should go and live in the Asian subcontinent or Africa instead of bringing millions of Asians and Africans to the UK.
In secret, he brought 3,000,000 immigrants to the UK between 1999 and 2008, nobody knew about it, we gradually found about it when London looked like an African or Asian capital complete with burkas
We have almost lost our country thanks to Brown Gordon|||Look up the definition of the word ''Incompetence'' there is a picture of Gordon Brown next to it!
Also if you look up the word definition for ''Lying Scum'' it says 'New Labour, ie...Lord Mandleson.|||I didn't vote for Lab-Con or Lib-dems, I voted for the only party who had any sense, UKIP the only party that would bring Britain out of the EU.|||Well, at the last election everybody knew Gordon Brown would be Prime Minister as Tony Blair said he would quit, so bearing that in mind, it just shows how short everyone's memories are.|||never voted for labour and I somehow dont think that Gordon Brown will convince me to do otherwise.
To use an old ad slogan "labour isn't working".|||No - if i was a Liebour supporter , i would have preferred someone slightly less dishonest but i can't think of anyone!|||Nope - I would never vote Labour. They are incompetent.|||Nope, when he got announced as the next PM i cringed, i knew what he'd be like from day one.|||No.|||Not a snowball's chance in hell.|||No. not while there is a hole in his ars-|||I'm an advocate of Tory Democracy so I would never vote for Labour, but I am voting for the Liberal Democrats this time round (I'm not putting my X next to James Gray).
In Switzerland, Turkish Labour Party leader whose name Perincek is judged by Swiss Court. What do you think ?
Dogu Perincek is a leader of Turkish Labour Party. He said that, 'So-called Armenian Genocide is a lie' . What about freedom of thought ?
Is this Europa ? Why do people wear 'Horse-Glasses' ?
Please do not say 'Wrong Category'. I asked also Yahoo 'Law-Ethics'. I am curiosly your answer.
Regards|||duffy guess you are wearing the horse glasses, have you read what you wrote?
Armenian genocide is a lie...but you people can't find any false and just make it up if there's not one...
European policies are two faced.......so I am not surprised about this.....
Turkish policies are 1 million times better then Europe could ever be if they worked on it all their lifes...|||Europa is talking about that there is no independence of ideas in turkiye [because of 301. law which says a person who insults turkiye or turks, are punished], while they have such kind of laws, even also they get involved about the so-called genocide which is nothing to do with them. So, where is the indepedence of ideas in Europa?
Perincek has gone to Switzerland with many documents which show that there is no genocide and turks have been killed by armenians, too. if someone says there is armenian genocide, s/he has to say there is turkish genocide, too. Even turkish archieves are open and turks doesnt take these claims seriously, many people believe in the genocide so that in their country armenians talk about a so-called genocide so much.
Why those countries accept this nonsense thing by their courts or laws and let historians talk about it?
This is the ignorance of big, modern and improved Europa. Or this is a politic effort against turkiye...
TURKISH LAW CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN MODELLED FROM SWITZERLAND'S, SO WHAT ABOUT THAT ALSO?|||I prefer that saying stupid malicious lies should not be illegal. I believe that when ideas are freely exchanged, the truth will come out.
Unfortunately, Turkiye is even worse than Switzerland for this. Hrant Dink, the Turkish Armenian, was convicted and then murdered for telling the truth.
At least Switzerland's law has a good motive; they don't want another genocide like the Jewish holocaust.
Turkiye's law is just trying to cover up the crimes of its ancestors.
This is foolish. You are not your ancestor, and their crimes are not your fault. So why do you want to compound the crime by denying it?
Who is really wearing blinders (horse glasses)?
Is this Europa ? Why do people wear 'Horse-Glasses' ?
Please do not say 'Wrong Category'. I asked also Yahoo 'Law-Ethics'. I am curiosly your answer.
Regards|||duffy guess you are wearing the horse glasses, have you read what you wrote?
Armenian genocide is a lie...but you people can't find any false and just make it up if there's not one...
European policies are two faced.......so I am not surprised about this.....
Turkish policies are 1 million times better then Europe could ever be if they worked on it all their lifes...|||Europa is talking about that there is no independence of ideas in turkiye [because of 301. law which says a person who insults turkiye or turks, are punished], while they have such kind of laws, even also they get involved about the so-called genocide which is nothing to do with them. So, where is the indepedence of ideas in Europa?
Perincek has gone to Switzerland with many documents which show that there is no genocide and turks have been killed by armenians, too. if someone says there is armenian genocide, s/he has to say there is turkish genocide, too. Even turkish archieves are open and turks doesnt take these claims seriously, many people believe in the genocide so that in their country armenians talk about a so-called genocide so much.
Why those countries accept this nonsense thing by their courts or laws and let historians talk about it?
This is the ignorance of big, modern and improved Europa. Or this is a politic effort against turkiye...
TURKISH LAW CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN MODELLED FROM SWITZERLAND'S, SO WHAT ABOUT THAT ALSO?|||I prefer that saying stupid malicious lies should not be illegal. I believe that when ideas are freely exchanged, the truth will come out.
Unfortunately, Turkiye is even worse than Switzerland for this. Hrant Dink, the Turkish Armenian, was convicted and then murdered for telling the truth.
At least Switzerland's law has a good motive; they don't want another genocide like the Jewish holocaust.
Turkiye's law is just trying to cover up the crimes of its ancestors.
This is foolish. You are not your ancestor, and their crimes are not your fault. So why do you want to compound the crime by denying it?
Who is really wearing blinders (horse glasses)?
Who actually is Obama, New Party leader, Democrat(which he is not) or a Socialist.?
Your call America pin a tail on em.|||1. New Party Idealist, since he was the head of that movement,
2. Communist sympathizer
3. Socialist
4. Islamic radical sympathizer.
What he is not is an honorable truth telling American.|||An ultra liberal socialist|||He is the next Democrat to be elected President of the United States of America.|||He is a democrat! You can pick and choose and puts words in his mouth, all you want it does not change the fact that he is a democrat. I would not argue that McCain and George bush are not republicans, so why would you argue that Obama is not a democrat.
Just plain idiotic.|||He's A chosen PUPPET for Nancy P.%26amp; her little CLICK|||http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008鈥?/a>|||Another inane question. You should have included a relevant answer, like "next president of the United States". Again another moron who obviously doesn't have any idea what socialism is. The information is readily available. Why haven't you found it yet? |||The political, media, cultural and social establishments are determined to elect the pro-status quo, anti-change candidate, Barack Obama, as President.
The power and money arrayed behind Obama seem unbeatable.
At the same time, it is inconceivable that the American people would elect a socialist President.
Obama has some explaining to do.
Slowly but surely "rock star" Barack Obama's lipstick
is coming off with every bad decision, and by now even
his vice president candidate Senator Joe Biden had to
admit:
Mrs. Clinton would've been the better pig pick.|||I do not think obama is a socialist be is a sway er.|||Chief, that's a good question. I've been asking the same thing myself, trying to figure out what Obama's actual ideology is, who this guy is. I have a hunch that if people really knew what his true ideology is, he wouldn't have gotten this far. He has a habit of associating with radicals. His economic ideology, at least, when you examine is at minimum quasi-Marxist. He went to a church for 2 yrs that preaches Black liberation theology, which has it's origins in Marxism. I believe that we're moving in a dangerous direction as a country. We now have the government bailing out Wall Street and owning these companies. . .that's a dangerous move toward socialism in itself.
As a democrat, I don't feel that I have any political home anymore because the party has been taken over by leftists. Obama is not a traditional democrat in any sense of the word, and McCain's economic policies are much closer to JFKs than Obama's are. Obama's economic ideology is based in the idea of class struggle, which is decidedly Marxist. Those of you who deny it need to take a look a Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. The parallels are uncanny.
I came across an interesting quote last night. It's actually from Norman Thomas who was the leading Socialist in the US prior to his death. He once said, "The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name of Liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened."
I think that quote speaks volumes about what's happening right now in our country. We're treading dangerous water. |||I guess we could call him a democrat with a socialist agenda. With all that is going on with the economic crisis, he will not have any wealth to redistribute. It seems alot of things are coming together. There was a meeting of muslims that his campaign attended. It turned out to be radical muslims and of course he claims his campaign did not know that when they accepted the invite. The Law suit regarding his citizenship is still unsettled. Rezko is singing like a bird to get his sentence reduced. Ayers is getting more and more coverage, so much so that very few can now believe Obamas version of thisacquaintancee. And then there is ACORN busting wide open and it is well known they are registering dems for obama, dead or alive. Then on mon. Corsi returns from Kenya with his emails between Odinga and Obama. Supposedly Obama told him how to run his campaign and what to do if he loses the election. We all know the blood bath that ensued when Odinga lost. Who is Obama? He is well known by the people he has surrounded himself with.
2. Communist sympathizer
3. Socialist
4. Islamic radical sympathizer.
What he is not is an honorable truth telling American.|||An ultra liberal socialist|||He is the next Democrat to be elected President of the United States of America.|||He is a democrat! You can pick and choose and puts words in his mouth, all you want it does not change the fact that he is a democrat. I would not argue that McCain and George bush are not republicans, so why would you argue that Obama is not a democrat.
Just plain idiotic.|||He's A chosen PUPPET for Nancy P.%26amp; her little CLICK|||http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008鈥?/a>|||Another inane question. You should have included a relevant answer, like "next president of the United States". Again another moron who obviously doesn't have any idea what socialism is. The information is readily available. Why haven't you found it yet? |||The political, media, cultural and social establishments are determined to elect the pro-status quo, anti-change candidate, Barack Obama, as President.
The power and money arrayed behind Obama seem unbeatable.
At the same time, it is inconceivable that the American people would elect a socialist President.
Obama has some explaining to do.
Slowly but surely "rock star" Barack Obama's lipstick
is coming off with every bad decision, and by now even
his vice president candidate Senator Joe Biden had to
admit:
Mrs. Clinton would've been the better pig pick.|||I do not think obama is a socialist be is a sway er.|||Chief, that's a good question. I've been asking the same thing myself, trying to figure out what Obama's actual ideology is, who this guy is. I have a hunch that if people really knew what his true ideology is, he wouldn't have gotten this far. He has a habit of associating with radicals. His economic ideology, at least, when you examine is at minimum quasi-Marxist. He went to a church for 2 yrs that preaches Black liberation theology, which has it's origins in Marxism. I believe that we're moving in a dangerous direction as a country. We now have the government bailing out Wall Street and owning these companies. . .that's a dangerous move toward socialism in itself.
As a democrat, I don't feel that I have any political home anymore because the party has been taken over by leftists. Obama is not a traditional democrat in any sense of the word, and McCain's economic policies are much closer to JFKs than Obama's are. Obama's economic ideology is based in the idea of class struggle, which is decidedly Marxist. Those of you who deny it need to take a look a Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. The parallels are uncanny.
I came across an interesting quote last night. It's actually from Norman Thomas who was the leading Socialist in the US prior to his death. He once said, "The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name of Liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened."
I think that quote speaks volumes about what's happening right now in our country. We're treading dangerous water. |||I guess we could call him a democrat with a socialist agenda. With all that is going on with the economic crisis, he will not have any wealth to redistribute. It seems alot of things are coming together. There was a meeting of muslims that his campaign attended. It turned out to be radical muslims and of course he claims his campaign did not know that when they accepted the invite. The Law suit regarding his citizenship is still unsettled. Rezko is singing like a bird to get his sentence reduced. Ayers is getting more and more coverage, so much so that very few can now believe Obamas version of thisacquaintancee. And then there is ACORN busting wide open and it is well known they are registering dems for obama, dead or alive. Then on mon. Corsi returns from Kenya with his emails between Odinga and Obama. Supposedly Obama told him how to run his campaign and what to do if he loses the election. We all know the blood bath that ensued when Odinga lost. Who is Obama? He is well known by the people he has surrounded himself with.
Would you prefer Keeley Hazell as the Tory Party leader over David Cameron?
Only if she gets her t*ts out.|||Well, I as a US citizen feel the better candidate would be in favor of legalizing your privately owned firearms. The unarmed people have become prey. Glad I don't live in your country.
Who was the best Liberal/SDP/Liberal Democrat party leader since WWII? Who was the worst?
Please give reasons.|||This is a tough one to answer - since it's difficult to judge a leader who wasn't in power. By that, as the only one who has ever tasted being in government Nick Clegg is simultaneously best and worst.
In terms of picking a "best", Nick Clegg is the only one who has ever succeeded in making the party relevant. I might have picked Charles Kennedy (I liked him, %26amp; sacking somebody because he liked a drink was ridiculous), but he was opposed to the LibDems joining in a coalition with the tories - which begs the question as to what he thought the purpose of the party was, if not to have a say in the way this country is governed?
At the same time, Nick Clegg should have realised that a hung parliament was the most likely way that the party would ever have a say - there's a certain pledge that should never have been made, since the only way it could only possibly have been kept would be if they won a majority.
Paddy Ashdown was good, and has managed to this day to retain respect from across the political spectrum.
David Steel came pretty close to winning an election, and probably would but for Thatcher's election-winning war in the Falklands.
Overall, I'm going to pick Paddy Ashdown as best, but Nick Clegg %26amp; David Steel have a case.
Worst? David Owen.
His marked antipathy towards the left of the party caused damaging divisions, leaving the party difficult to take seriously %26amp; open to satire (wonderfully exploited by Spitting Image amongst others).
Favoured a hard line over the miners' strike.
More recently he spoke out against the move to AV, succeeding in convincing a lot of people that a NO vote in the referendum would somehow pave the way for Proportional Representation. Any signs of that happening?
Undoubtedly a talented politician, but a snake in the grass.|||Let's educate a few of these Americans:
Liberal leaders:
Sir Archibald Sinclair (1935-45)
Clement Davies (1945-56)
Jo Grimond (1956-67 and 1976)
Jeremy Thorpe (1967-76)
David Steel (1976-88)
SDP Leaders:
Roy Jenkins (1981-83)
David Owen (1983-87 and 1988-90)
Robert Maclennan (1987-88)
SLD/Liberal Democrat Leaders:
Paddy Ashdown (1988-99)
Charles Kennedy (1999-2006)
Sir Menzies Campbell (2006-2007)
Vince Cable (2007)
Nick Clegg (2007-date)
Jeremy Thorpe was leader during the Liberal breakthrough in February 1974, when they took second place in a large number of constituencies, and was therefore the main challenger in many seats.
The two Davids set up the Alliance, which achieved a solid local authority base, as well as being taken seriously at last by the media. Media attention did the Alliance no favours, especially the Spitting Image puppets, which destroyed David Steel's credibility.
Paddy Ashdown picked up the broken pieces of the Alliance, and brought the merged party back to the same level it was in the mid 1980s.
Nick Clegg led the party into Government, but the compromises over firm pledges he made during the General Election in 2010 has affected the party's core vote - notably students - so we have to see if the party recovers in time for 2015.
I think my favourite was Jo Grimond, who set the philosophical foundation of the party in the early 1960s and enabled a whole generation to campaign effectively on sound principles (even though too many failed to understand them). There was a good feeling in the Liberal Party concerning localism, individuality and a great sense of justice both at home and abroad.
The worst? Probably Sir Menzies Campbell, although it was hardly his fault. He is the same age as both Paddy Ashdown and outgoing Tory leader Michael Howard, who made a big deal of how he was too old to lead a party and was handing the leadership over to a younger man. Now Dracula still had his black hair and looked about 10 years younger than Menzies Campbell, so the media were merciless, portraying Ming as a doddery old fool. A pity, since he was extremely effective as Foreign Affairs spokesman during the Iraq war.|||The best democrat was John F. Kennedy
The worst was either Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton|||Clinton, because he had Republican Congress majority and Newt Gingrich tell him how to fix our debt problems .|||Paddy Ashdown, great bloke.
In terms of picking a "best", Nick Clegg is the only one who has ever succeeded in making the party relevant. I might have picked Charles Kennedy (I liked him, %26amp; sacking somebody because he liked a drink was ridiculous), but he was opposed to the LibDems joining in a coalition with the tories - which begs the question as to what he thought the purpose of the party was, if not to have a say in the way this country is governed?
At the same time, Nick Clegg should have realised that a hung parliament was the most likely way that the party would ever have a say - there's a certain pledge that should never have been made, since the only way it could only possibly have been kept would be if they won a majority.
Paddy Ashdown was good, and has managed to this day to retain respect from across the political spectrum.
David Steel came pretty close to winning an election, and probably would but for Thatcher's election-winning war in the Falklands.
Overall, I'm going to pick Paddy Ashdown as best, but Nick Clegg %26amp; David Steel have a case.
Worst? David Owen.
His marked antipathy towards the left of the party caused damaging divisions, leaving the party difficult to take seriously %26amp; open to satire (wonderfully exploited by Spitting Image amongst others).
Favoured a hard line over the miners' strike.
More recently he spoke out against the move to AV, succeeding in convincing a lot of people that a NO vote in the referendum would somehow pave the way for Proportional Representation. Any signs of that happening?
Undoubtedly a talented politician, but a snake in the grass.|||Let's educate a few of these Americans:
Liberal leaders:
Sir Archibald Sinclair (1935-45)
Clement Davies (1945-56)
Jo Grimond (1956-67 and 1976)
Jeremy Thorpe (1967-76)
David Steel (1976-88)
SDP Leaders:
Roy Jenkins (1981-83)
David Owen (1983-87 and 1988-90)
Robert Maclennan (1987-88)
SLD/Liberal Democrat Leaders:
Paddy Ashdown (1988-99)
Charles Kennedy (1999-2006)
Sir Menzies Campbell (2006-2007)
Vince Cable (2007)
Nick Clegg (2007-date)
Jeremy Thorpe was leader during the Liberal breakthrough in February 1974, when they took second place in a large number of constituencies, and was therefore the main challenger in many seats.
The two Davids set up the Alliance, which achieved a solid local authority base, as well as being taken seriously at last by the media. Media attention did the Alliance no favours, especially the Spitting Image puppets, which destroyed David Steel's credibility.
Paddy Ashdown picked up the broken pieces of the Alliance, and brought the merged party back to the same level it was in the mid 1980s.
Nick Clegg led the party into Government, but the compromises over firm pledges he made during the General Election in 2010 has affected the party's core vote - notably students - so we have to see if the party recovers in time for 2015.
I think my favourite was Jo Grimond, who set the philosophical foundation of the party in the early 1960s and enabled a whole generation to campaign effectively on sound principles (even though too many failed to understand them). There was a good feeling in the Liberal Party concerning localism, individuality and a great sense of justice both at home and abroad.
The worst? Probably Sir Menzies Campbell, although it was hardly his fault. He is the same age as both Paddy Ashdown and outgoing Tory leader Michael Howard, who made a big deal of how he was too old to lead a party and was handing the leadership over to a younger man. Now Dracula still had his black hair and looked about 10 years younger than Menzies Campbell, so the media were merciless, portraying Ming as a doddery old fool. A pity, since he was extremely effective as Foreign Affairs spokesman during the Iraq war.|||The best democrat was John F. Kennedy
The worst was either Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton|||Clinton, because he had Republican Congress majority and Newt Gingrich tell him how to fix our debt problems .|||Paddy Ashdown, great bloke.
Why has the death threats of Eric Fuller(democrat) against aTEA PARTY leader going unreported in the lib media?
could it be its the lies of the lib media pushed him to do it?...who are the real responsible parties?http://www.theblaze.com/stories/shooting鈥?/a>|||Because they are only interested in blaming the TEA Party. That wouldn't help them do so.|||Funny, I heard about it on NPR. I guess you are referring to Huffington or something?
"The Pima County Sheriff's Office said J. Eric Fuller, 63, was involuntarily committed to an undisclosed medical facility, NBC News reported."
Pima County sheriff's deputies escort James Eric Fuller after he allegedly made threats at a town hall meeting. (ABC) TUCSON, Ariz. (CBS/AP)
Jan 17, 2011 ... Tucson, Arizona (CNN) -- Arizona shooting victim James Eric Fuller sent his apologies Monday for telling a Tea Party leader, "you are dead."|||Wow this is wierd. If I say blue is yellow then nobody believes me. If I say that liberals are not reporting that blue is yellow all the conservatives then believe me. No doubt were I to say that Glenn Beck was not reporting that blue is yellow then all the libs would believe me.
Why don't people just check up on things themselves?? Surely it's better than choosing which liar you are going to slavishly follow. Especially when, deep down, you know they are liars.|||Really? I've heard a lot about this story.
Death threats are nothing new anyway. Every single political leader on both sides has received them. It's not news.|||Because the liberal media is very bias. They will only report things that go in their favor or they will put a twist on a story to make it go in their favor.|||Since I saw this story on Keith Olberman last night, I guess he's now part of the right wing media|||He actually meant something positive when he said that. Nice way of taking him out of context.|||Guess it's cause Wolf Blitzer would rather talk to Sheriff Dumpazzfor half an hour.|||I have seen it and I do not watch fox news,so wrong
"The Pima County Sheriff's Office said J. Eric Fuller, 63, was involuntarily committed to an undisclosed medical facility, NBC News reported."
Pima County sheriff's deputies escort James Eric Fuller after he allegedly made threats at a town hall meeting. (ABC) TUCSON, Ariz. (CBS/AP)
Jan 17, 2011 ... Tucson, Arizona (CNN) -- Arizona shooting victim James Eric Fuller sent his apologies Monday for telling a Tea Party leader, "you are dead."|||Wow this is wierd. If I say blue is yellow then nobody believes me. If I say that liberals are not reporting that blue is yellow all the conservatives then believe me. No doubt were I to say that Glenn Beck was not reporting that blue is yellow then all the libs would believe me.
Why don't people just check up on things themselves?? Surely it's better than choosing which liar you are going to slavishly follow. Especially when, deep down, you know they are liars.|||Really? I've heard a lot about this story.
Death threats are nothing new anyway. Every single political leader on both sides has received them. It's not news.|||Because the liberal media is very bias. They will only report things that go in their favor or they will put a twist on a story to make it go in their favor.|||Since I saw this story on Keith Olberman last night, I guess he's now part of the right wing media|||He actually meant something positive when he said that. Nice way of taking him out of context.|||Guess it's cause Wolf Blitzer would rather talk to Sheriff Dumpazzfor half an hour.|||I have seen it and I do not watch fox news,so wrong
Conservative Party Leader Succession?
When Stephen Harper steps down as leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, who do you think will be his successor?|||If you asked this a couple months ago, I would have said Jim Prentice or possibly Peter McKay. I have a feeling that unless the old Progressive Conservative wing of the party stands up and takes some control it might be someone like Jon Baird.|||Tony Clement
What will McCain's role back in the senate be next year, will he be a party leader?
He'll be emptying the garbage cans at the republican cafeteria, which is also what Lieberman will be doing on the Democratic side.
|||As President, he might allow obama a visit now and again to show him what hard work might bring him someday if he actually ever gains any real experience...|||Which party ? Failed stupid 'mavericks' |||He'll be dead next year.
|||As President, he might allow obama a visit now and again to show him what hard work might bring him someday if he actually ever gains any real experience...|||Which party ? Failed stupid 'mavericks' |||He'll be dead next year.
Who is the leader of the democatic party?
Is there one leader that a Party follows in the US? for example in the UK, Blair is the leader of the Labor party so by that he become Prime minister, same in canada, Harper is the leader of the conservatives and he become PM, the leader of the Liberals be default becomes the head of the opposition and all levels of governement, i.e parlement and the senate follow his lead.
How does that work in the US? I know there are a couple of different leaders one for the house, and one for the senate and of course there is the President, but is there 1 leader for a party that speaks on behalf of the party at the federal and state level?|||Each party has a Party Chariperson. Often, this person is not an elected member of any government body. Current, Howard Dean is chairperson of the Democratic Party and Mike Duncan is chairman of the Republican Party. But the chairs are more organizers, not necessarily leaders. The leaders are usually acknowledged to be the highest-level elected leader, which would be Bush for the GOP and Nancy Pelosi for the Dems. (Pelosi because, as Speaker of the House, the's third in line of succession to the Presidency.)|||stephen colbert|||Leader?
What a concept!|||Hugo Chavez.|||There is a Democratic leader in the House and in the Senate.
The Senate Majority Leader right now is Harry Reid
Speaker of the House is Nancy Pelosi.
Pelosi has moe power because she is thrid in line to the presidency.
So if Bush and Cheney die or are impeached, she would become president. And then we are all doomed.|||The party chairman would be Dr. Howard Dean, former Governor of Vermont. As for actual party leader in the British sense I would say, comparing to House of Commons it would be the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, D, CA. In the Senate, your House of Lords, it would be Harry Reid, D. Nev. His title is Senate Majority Leader. Ms. Pelosi is second in line to the Presidency. If something should happen to Bush and Cheney she would ascend to the Presidency.|||Planned parenthood and the rainbow coalition.|||It doesn't exactly work the same way.
In the actual government, the Democratic party's leaders are House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi %26amp; the Senate's majority Leader Harry Reid.
However, the actual political party itself has leadership, which has no part in the governmental system. The Chairman of the Democratic Party, who along with a bunch of other people, help form the political platform (ideas and policies) of the party, is Howard Dean.|||There are 3:
1) Nancy Pelosy, Speaker of the House
2) Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader
3) Howard Dean, DNC chair
How does that work in the US? I know there are a couple of different leaders one for the house, and one for the senate and of course there is the President, but is there 1 leader for a party that speaks on behalf of the party at the federal and state level?|||Each party has a Party Chariperson. Often, this person is not an elected member of any government body. Current, Howard Dean is chairperson of the Democratic Party and Mike Duncan is chairman of the Republican Party. But the chairs are more organizers, not necessarily leaders. The leaders are usually acknowledged to be the highest-level elected leader, which would be Bush for the GOP and Nancy Pelosi for the Dems. (Pelosi because, as Speaker of the House, the's third in line of succession to the Presidency.)|||stephen colbert|||Leader?
What a concept!|||Hugo Chavez.|||There is a Democratic leader in the House and in the Senate.
The Senate Majority Leader right now is Harry Reid
Speaker of the House is Nancy Pelosi.
Pelosi has moe power because she is thrid in line to the presidency.
So if Bush and Cheney die or are impeached, she would become president. And then we are all doomed.|||The party chairman would be Dr. Howard Dean, former Governor of Vermont. As for actual party leader in the British sense I would say, comparing to House of Commons it would be the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, D, CA. In the Senate, your House of Lords, it would be Harry Reid, D. Nev. His title is Senate Majority Leader. Ms. Pelosi is second in line to the Presidency. If something should happen to Bush and Cheney she would ascend to the Presidency.|||Planned parenthood and the rainbow coalition.|||It doesn't exactly work the same way.
In the actual government, the Democratic party's leaders are House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi %26amp; the Senate's majority Leader Harry Reid.
However, the actual political party itself has leadership, which has no part in the governmental system. The Chairman of the Democratic Party, who along with a bunch of other people, help form the political platform (ideas and policies) of the party, is Howard Dean.|||There are 3:
1) Nancy Pelosy, Speaker of the House
2) Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader
3) Howard Dean, DNC chair
Will Warren Jeff's conviction on multiple counts of child-rape affect his position as a Tea Party leader?
Never heard of him.|||No. They have the same values :
They fight abortions by bombing clinics, they fight for family values by raping altar boys , they fight for high morality in congress by soliciting sex in a men's room (GOP senator Larry Craig), they fight for fiscal responsibility by stealing (GOP speaker Tom Delay - a convicted thief), they fight muslim terrorism by bombing government buildings and shooting their own citizens and kids (Breivik- new conservative hero),they fight for balanced budget by starting new illegal and expensive wars , they fight for America by making president to fail (party of "idiotic NO") ...|||No, he fits right in.
They fight abortions by bombing clinics, they fight for family values by raping altar boys , they fight for high morality in congress by soliciting sex in a men's room (GOP senator Larry Craig), they fight for fiscal responsibility by stealing (GOP speaker Tom Delay - a convicted thief), they fight muslim terrorism by bombing government buildings and shooting their own citizens and kids (Breivik- new conservative hero),they fight for balanced budget by starting new illegal and expensive wars , they fight for America by making president to fail (party of "idiotic NO") ...|||No, he fits right in.
Do conservatives agree with Tea Party leader Mark Williams?
Yesterday Tea Party leader Mark Williams called Obama a half white muslim racist.|||i hope not, sounds like something i'd expect out of a Klan leader|||I've never heard of him, but, yes I do agree with him if it's true.|||The truth is the truth...anyone who has read Obamas books can't say he isn't...|||the tea party has no established leader.|||Sounds about right, except for the Muslim part.|||Well he is half white but beyond that I would probably disagree..|||Did Obama not attend a racist church , did not Obama say that the USA was not a Christian nation and that ISLAM was his brother ?|||Yes, I agree with that statement.
Only I would have called him a Mongrel Retard Muslim racist.|||Mark Williams?
But your description of barack insane sounds right on target.|||I didn't catch the whole text of the statement, but I certainly don't agree or support such thinking!
I will however, point out that the 'bowing' and constant praise of Muslim attitudes by Obama does tend to raise doubt!|||I have a fundamental problem with name calling in general.
If I thought Obama was a Muslim (in effect calling him a liar) rather than say it, I would point out the facts that support it.
If I thought Obama was a racist, I would point out the facts that support it.
If I thought Obama was a socialist, I would point out the facts that support it.
Etc...
Name calling backfires in most segments of society.|||I don't know Mark Williams (although you assign him as my leader) and I don't have racial or religious preferences for my President.
I do think he's an outlandish spender of our children's future
Only I would have called him a Mongrel Retard Muslim racist.|||Mark Williams?
But your description of barack insane sounds right on target.|||I didn't catch the whole text of the statement, but I certainly don't agree or support such thinking!
I will however, point out that the 'bowing' and constant praise of Muslim attitudes by Obama does tend to raise doubt!|||I have a fundamental problem with name calling in general.
If I thought Obama was a Muslim (in effect calling him a liar) rather than say it, I would point out the facts that support it.
If I thought Obama was a racist, I would point out the facts that support it.
If I thought Obama was a socialist, I would point out the facts that support it.
Etc...
Name calling backfires in most segments of society.|||I don't know Mark Williams (although you assign him as my leader) and I don't have racial or religious preferences for my President.
I do think he's an outlandish spender of our children's future
Florida Tea Party leader and candidate arrested on charges of drug trafficking?
Does this arrest bring us closer to understanding the main reason Rush and Beck are so enthusiastic about these gatherings?
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_po鈥?/a>|||hilarious
now that Rush can't get any more oxycontin maybe he's switching to a different drug. Doesn't he live in Florida?
it would also explain Beck's mood swings.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying Rush or Beck are abusing hydrocodone, I'm just asking if they could be. If they aren't abusing drugs, why they haven't said they aren't?|||Probably not.|||That guy voted for Obama|||Give me a break! Liberals want to legalize drugs! Conservatives are mostly Christians who oppose of illegal drugs.|||As a Floridian myself, I still will not be voting Democrat.|||Oh no! You mean one guy in in thousands of Democrats as well as Republicans was arrested?! Shocking! This guy is STILL above ACORN who supports human trafficking for child prostitution. Yet, not one of them was arrested. How coincidental.|||Did you read the entire article? Of course NOT! The article does not state he was a "Tea Party leader", only that he launched his desire to run for councilman at a Tea Party event!|||how dare you expose the right for being hypocritical. How dare you hold up a mirror to the right wing fanatics who cannot practice what they preach. How dare you support your question with a reliable source. How dare you defend exposing truth. You gotta lot of nerve exposing corruption in the gop. What are you, anyway, some sort of honest, law abiding citizen?|||If you live in Florida and you are not trafficking drugs....what are you doing there?????|||Rush and Beck could just go to Barney Franks pot house.|||he was NOT a tea party leader/candidate.
i thought florida was considered a blue state.
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_po鈥?/a>|||hilarious
now that Rush can't get any more oxycontin maybe he's switching to a different drug. Doesn't he live in Florida?
it would also explain Beck's mood swings.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying Rush or Beck are abusing hydrocodone, I'm just asking if they could be. If they aren't abusing drugs, why they haven't said they aren't?|||Probably not.|||That guy voted for Obama|||Give me a break! Liberals want to legalize drugs! Conservatives are mostly Christians who oppose of illegal drugs.|||As a Floridian myself, I still will not be voting Democrat.|||Oh no! You mean one guy in in thousands of Democrats as well as Republicans was arrested?! Shocking! This guy is STILL above ACORN who supports human trafficking for child prostitution. Yet, not one of them was arrested. How coincidental.|||Did you read the entire article? Of course NOT! The article does not state he was a "Tea Party leader", only that he launched his desire to run for councilman at a Tea Party event!|||how dare you expose the right for being hypocritical. How dare you hold up a mirror to the right wing fanatics who cannot practice what they preach. How dare you support your question with a reliable source. How dare you defend exposing truth. You gotta lot of nerve exposing corruption in the gop. What are you, anyway, some sort of honest, law abiding citizen?|||If you live in Florida and you are not trafficking drugs....what are you doing there?????|||Rush and Beck could just go to Barney Franks pot house.|||he was NOT a tea party leader/candidate.
i thought florida was considered a blue state.
Is it right to consider the British National Party and its charismaric leader Nick Griffin as "xenophobics"?
I麓m sure you know well the difference between the term "xenophobic" and the term "racist." For example, a political party can be xenophobic, but not racist, if it refuses to accept any type of immigrants, including whites. Meanwhile, a political party can be racist, but not xenophobic, if it accepts the white immigrants but rejects the native blacks and asiatics who were born and live legally in the country.|||Yes, it is right to call it xenophobic. Blaming immigration for economics is wilfully simplistic. When immigration appears to have a negative economic effect, that exposes the exploitative, punitive and oppressive nature of the economic policies and proves nothing about immigrants. Groups like BNP would make excuses for the policies and scapegoat based on visual criteria that requires no intelligence or knowledge to understand. Is that not textbook xenophobia?|||No, xenophobes hate and fear foreigners. Racists generally hate people of a different race.
You can want your country to be predominantly occupied by your own people, and believe too many foreigners and people of a different race (and culture) is damaging your society and culture without fearing or hating them.
I, like the vast majority of English people, believe just that. I hate what mass immigration has done to our society. But I neither hate nor fear foreigners.
I am proud to be an Englishman and I think (for example) Indians should be proud to be Indians and proud of their ancient culture. I respect them and their culture. That does NOT mean I want millions of Indian people living in England.
It's typical of today's PC world that wanting our country to remain English can attract such a nonsensical label as racist or xenophobic. No wonder the BNP is attracting so much support.|||Griff is our boy and he is fighting for us, racist no, realist most defiantly, don't confuse xenophobia with concern you don't need t be a racist to be concerned.
Hey I'll tel you what don't hide behind your question now you have made it clear where you stand come out and debate it. You can start by telling us about those ordinary white indigenous people who are concerned at the number of immigrants already here and still streaming in. Are they all racists? come on we want to know.
ATB Red|||No. Griffin is an old-fashioned white supremacist racist, and has been for 30 years.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_EhJQ-WwbN6Q/Si鈥?/a>|||No because xenophobia is the fear of foreigners and Nick Griffin isnt scared of foreigners he just doesnt like them.|||How is racism not xenophobia?
Racism is just a form of xenophobia.|||they r xenophobic and racist. Nick Griffin is not charismatic though.|||Nic griffin is a nationalist and a realist|||I would be comfortable calling the BNP both.|||Charismatic leader?......What a laugh!...And yes.....they are xenophobic.|||I would have thought "fascist" was more like it...|||They want Britain to be British I do not see whats wrong with that.
Besides as an American it is not my concern.|||you enjoy being 1/6 of your own country huh|||If Nick Griffin is charismatic,
There is hope for us all.
You can want your country to be predominantly occupied by your own people, and believe too many foreigners and people of a different race (and culture) is damaging your society and culture without fearing or hating them.
I, like the vast majority of English people, believe just that. I hate what mass immigration has done to our society. But I neither hate nor fear foreigners.
I am proud to be an Englishman and I think (for example) Indians should be proud to be Indians and proud of their ancient culture. I respect them and their culture. That does NOT mean I want millions of Indian people living in England.
It's typical of today's PC world that wanting our country to remain English can attract such a nonsensical label as racist or xenophobic. No wonder the BNP is attracting so much support.|||Griff is our boy and he is fighting for us, racist no, realist most defiantly, don't confuse xenophobia with concern you don't need t be a racist to be concerned.
Hey I'll tel you what don't hide behind your question now you have made it clear where you stand come out and debate it. You can start by telling us about those ordinary white indigenous people who are concerned at the number of immigrants already here and still streaming in. Are they all racists? come on we want to know.
ATB Red|||No. Griffin is an old-fashioned white supremacist racist, and has been for 30 years.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_EhJQ-WwbN6Q/Si鈥?/a>|||No because xenophobia is the fear of foreigners and Nick Griffin isnt scared of foreigners he just doesnt like them.|||How is racism not xenophobia?
Racism is just a form of xenophobia.|||they r xenophobic and racist. Nick Griffin is not charismatic though.|||Nic griffin is a nationalist and a realist|||I would be comfortable calling the BNP both.|||Charismatic leader?......What a laugh!...And yes.....they are xenophobic.|||I would have thought "fascist" was more like it...|||They want Britain to be British I do not see whats wrong with that.
Besides as an American it is not my concern.|||you enjoy being 1/6 of your own country huh|||If Nick Griffin is charismatic,
There is hope for us all.
Bill Clinton as a party leader?
When Bill was in office how did he fill the role of party leader?|||Bill Clinton certainly did fill the role as party leader, and he was one of America's best leaders since Lyndon Johnson and FDR. Americans, who believe in equal opportunity, health and prosperity for all, tend to overlook the Monica scandal and focus on the real policies Clinton implemented. Support his wife in 2008.|||He brought the beer and condoms.|||he may have filled a few things, but party leader wasn't 1 of them.|||Actually, Monica was the one who got"filled"|||Good answer by Leogirl.. but I think he was a good leader and good president. He was human and as a human he massed up a few times...ANd look at how famous monica got. Without him what would she have done the rest of her life?.. A great way to get into history without killing anyone..|||He really doesn't have any experience as a leader and I don't think he would be able to make over the Democratic Party every time the polls changed. Besides that, having someone who was indicted on 21 federal crimes as your leader is not too smart unless it is of the Mafia.|||He had a party every time Hillary was out of town.
What is the name of the uk party leader, whose wife is called fifon?
William Hague his wife is Ffion (she's Welsh and the ff is pronounced as the English f, it's the welsh equivalent of Fiona). He was the leader of the Conservative party many leaders ago after John Major. The youngest party leader they had had.|||William Haigh. NB He is no longer the party leader of the Conservatives, but he does sit on the Opposition front bench (in other words, he is still a senior politician). By the way, his wife's name is Ffion (Welsh roots, I think)|||William haigh who was at one time the leader of the conservatives and is now a member of the shadow cabinet
Why aren't Liberals disgusted and humiliated by their party leader?
Because liberals reward failure.
Why cant the republican party find a leader that is intelligent and worthy to lead?
We dont want another republican in office so its great they are at a loss.|||What scares you about Ron Paul? The fact that he supports the US Constitution and might restore it as the "supreme law" once again in this country? That would abolish all of the socialistic programs supported by democrats, which are against the US Constitution?
Why do the democrats support any person just because he is a democrat? It is obvious that political experience is not important to democrats, as Obama only had 2 years in office before running for president and he has sealed all of his records and did not provide his birth certificate when asked but instead hired lawyers to stop the request in court, why would he do that unless he did not have one? Why don't the democrats want him to provide it and prove the republicans wrong, after all everyone has a birth certificate, true?|||Because they are red-baiting the fundie wing of the Party. It's a strategy they believe won them the WH in 2000 and will work again. Instead of trying to find someone reasonable and moderate they keep pushing crazier, stupider, religious. The Religious Right has destroyed the Party and they refuse to admit this. They've kicked out Frum, FFS, the Bush acolyte who invented "the axis of evil" is now too liberal for them. Madness.
Romney actually looks moderate in comparison (and the guy is a fundie Mormon), and is their best shot of not getting wiped out entirely in 2012.|||Because of the stupidities
Obama hasnt got a birth certificate (rolls eyes)
Obama is Hitler
Obama is muslim
Obama is preparing the ovens for the republicans (i wish lol )
Obama isnt black hes half white so we can hate him more
the list is huge
Sarah Palin lol
Michael Steele paying for the "christians" to sit in bi sexual bondage clubs and see men and women strip.
NO THANKS
NO more hypocrisies..
Vote Obama.|||Ron Paul. Google him or YouTube him. Other than him good luck finding a decent human who doesnt change his mind and policies everyday.|||ultimately because all they are all corrupt reguardless of party lines.|||because intelligence and right-wing don't go together.|||It is because they don't have one.
Why do the democrats support any person just because he is a democrat? It is obvious that political experience is not important to democrats, as Obama only had 2 years in office before running for president and he has sealed all of his records and did not provide his birth certificate when asked but instead hired lawyers to stop the request in court, why would he do that unless he did not have one? Why don't the democrats want him to provide it and prove the republicans wrong, after all everyone has a birth certificate, true?|||Because they are red-baiting the fundie wing of the Party. It's a strategy they believe won them the WH in 2000 and will work again. Instead of trying to find someone reasonable and moderate they keep pushing crazier, stupider, religious. The Religious Right has destroyed the Party and they refuse to admit this. They've kicked out Frum, FFS, the Bush acolyte who invented "the axis of evil" is now too liberal for them. Madness.
Romney actually looks moderate in comparison (and the guy is a fundie Mormon), and is their best shot of not getting wiped out entirely in 2012.|||Because of the stupidities
Obama hasnt got a birth certificate (rolls eyes)
Obama is Hitler
Obama is muslim
Obama is preparing the ovens for the republicans (i wish lol )
Obama isnt black hes half white so we can hate him more
the list is huge
Sarah Palin lol
Michael Steele paying for the "christians" to sit in bi sexual bondage clubs and see men and women strip.
NO THANKS
NO more hypocrisies..
Vote Obama.|||Ron Paul. Google him or YouTube him. Other than him good luck finding a decent human who doesnt change his mind and policies everyday.|||ultimately because all they are all corrupt reguardless of party lines.|||because intelligence and right-wing don't go together.|||It is because they don't have one.
Does the Labour party need a leader with a bit more oomph?
I hate the Tories. However, they could let the UK burn to ashes and STILL Ed would be too much of a blithering idiot to be a realistic alternative as Prime Minister.
Can Ed Miliband - in any universe - really be considered a future Prime Minister?|||The Labour Party needs to expel its entire front bench as Tory entryists, and replace them with honest socialists who have done something with their lives other than swim in the shite of the professional politicians' septic tank, which the present lot have swum in since their Oxford days.
Oxford Mafia Out!|||The last time the UK burned to ashes, they threw out a PM warlord bulldog with plenty of oomph and replaced him with a total non-entity, who was also a Labour Leader. This was the sort of PM who could be sitting in the room alone with you, and by the time you went for a leak you had forgotten his name. It was this leader that set up the NHS and introduced a Social Security system that has been sort-of functioning ever since.
We live in hope. Let's hope to God his party can re-establish its philosophical integrity, and that Ed will listen to his party's thinkers and workers, rather than to its stylists.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind鈥?/a>|||I hate the Labour Party! However dont worry, Ed has got the next GE wrapped up, this is the most hated government of all ages as Labour completely destroyed society reducing us to a nation of benefit scroungers and immigrants.
Ed is PM elect.
However much I hate Labour and its followers I love Tony Blair and I think David Milliband would have been more appealing as he is a Blair mini me as opposed to Ed who is Mini Gordon Brown.|||When one main party has policies which can only generate serious long-term economic problems, but receives NOTHING but positive praise from the "news" media: like the Conservatives do, and the other main party has far more benign and compassionate policies, offering long-term stability and sustainable moderate growth, but receives NOTHING but negative criticism in the "news" media, then it is almost impossible for humans to understand that they are being manipulated %26amp; controlled. In today's society, if you openly admit that you're socialist, you are ridiculed; while it is still perfectly acceptable to support the short-sighted, everything to the rich, unemployment increasing, economy destroying, single-parent blaming, crime level increasing, suicide rate increasing, greedy, selfish, uncaring Conservatives ideology. Murdoch has done this. Even today, as he is being attacked, he still controls the world. The truth is that The Lord God himself could be at the head of the Labour party, but with the vile biassed reporting in the "news" media, then he too would be presented as weak, slow, unthinking and unelectable. The ONLY way that we humans can begin to think again is by removing the entire "news" media from our lives. I did this some time ago and my life improved a million-fold.
(Research ELF waves if you can)|||What is it with the British...There are more than three political parties y'know.......I tell you what labour needs. Labour needs to be put on trial for treason after the deliberate mess it made of this country, Blaire and the top five also need to face trial for war crimes. That done, labour needs to be thrown in the political scrap heap where it belongs. In thirteen years labour caused more damage to this country than was caused in both world wars. Britain has never seen a more destructive traitor government.|||He was voted in by the Unions and is in hock to them. He can walk into an empty room and it will still be empty.
And like most of today's politicians (including Cameron), he has never had a proper job ourside Westminster in his life.|||I'm not so much concerned with Ed Miliband's lack of "oomph", as his party's policies. Their total and utter contempt for the low paid bothers me far more.|||He looks like a little Brat, who would vote in a leader who stabbed his own brother in the back? this guy has no soul at all he makes the Lizard people ruling the World look ethical.|||There is not much differnce these days, the days of the 'working man's party' are long gone , they are all college boys now.|||So you're saying Ed Miliband is worse than cleggy boy?
The sad thing is i agree with you.|||bachmann 2012!|||Clegg, Cameron and Miliband came from the same mo(u)ld.|||Yes Labour need a much more robust leader than Milliband. I do wish that Ed had not been chosen, but he was and unless something happens to him, he is there to stay. One thing for sure, we all want to see the back of Cameron and Clegg, the sooner the better.
Can Ed Miliband - in any universe - really be considered a future Prime Minister?|||The Labour Party needs to expel its entire front bench as Tory entryists, and replace them with honest socialists who have done something with their lives other than swim in the shite of the professional politicians' septic tank, which the present lot have swum in since their Oxford days.
Oxford Mafia Out!|||The last time the UK burned to ashes, they threw out a PM warlord bulldog with plenty of oomph and replaced him with a total non-entity, who was also a Labour Leader. This was the sort of PM who could be sitting in the room alone with you, and by the time you went for a leak you had forgotten his name. It was this leader that set up the NHS and introduced a Social Security system that has been sort-of functioning ever since.
We live in hope. Let's hope to God his party can re-establish its philosophical integrity, and that Ed will listen to his party's thinkers and workers, rather than to its stylists.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind鈥?/a>|||I hate the Labour Party! However dont worry, Ed has got the next GE wrapped up, this is the most hated government of all ages as Labour completely destroyed society reducing us to a nation of benefit scroungers and immigrants.
Ed is PM elect.
However much I hate Labour and its followers I love Tony Blair and I think David Milliband would have been more appealing as he is a Blair mini me as opposed to Ed who is Mini Gordon Brown.|||When one main party has policies which can only generate serious long-term economic problems, but receives NOTHING but positive praise from the "news" media: like the Conservatives do, and the other main party has far more benign and compassionate policies, offering long-term stability and sustainable moderate growth, but receives NOTHING but negative criticism in the "news" media, then it is almost impossible for humans to understand that they are being manipulated %26amp; controlled. In today's society, if you openly admit that you're socialist, you are ridiculed; while it is still perfectly acceptable to support the short-sighted, everything to the rich, unemployment increasing, economy destroying, single-parent blaming, crime level increasing, suicide rate increasing, greedy, selfish, uncaring Conservatives ideology. Murdoch has done this. Even today, as he is being attacked, he still controls the world. The truth is that The Lord God himself could be at the head of the Labour party, but with the vile biassed reporting in the "news" media, then he too would be presented as weak, slow, unthinking and unelectable. The ONLY way that we humans can begin to think again is by removing the entire "news" media from our lives. I did this some time ago and my life improved a million-fold.
(Research ELF waves if you can)|||What is it with the British...There are more than three political parties y'know.......I tell you what labour needs. Labour needs to be put on trial for treason after the deliberate mess it made of this country, Blaire and the top five also need to face trial for war crimes. That done, labour needs to be thrown in the political scrap heap where it belongs. In thirteen years labour caused more damage to this country than was caused in both world wars. Britain has never seen a more destructive traitor government.|||He was voted in by the Unions and is in hock to them. He can walk into an empty room and it will still be empty.
And like most of today's politicians (including Cameron), he has never had a proper job ourside Westminster in his life.|||I'm not so much concerned with Ed Miliband's lack of "oomph", as his party's policies. Their total and utter contempt for the low paid bothers me far more.|||He looks like a little Brat, who would vote in a leader who stabbed his own brother in the back? this guy has no soul at all he makes the Lizard people ruling the World look ethical.|||There is not much differnce these days, the days of the 'working man's party' are long gone , they are all college boys now.|||So you're saying Ed Miliband is worse than cleggy boy?
The sad thing is i agree with you.|||bachmann 2012!|||Clegg, Cameron and Miliband came from the same mo(u)ld.|||Yes Labour need a much more robust leader than Milliband. I do wish that Ed had not been chosen, but he was and unless something happens to him, he is there to stay. One thing for sure, we all want to see the back of Cameron and Clegg, the sooner the better.
Why do House Democrats want Botox Nancy as their party leader again?
Stockholm Syndrome|||Not all of them do.
But enough are convinced that losing 60 House seats had little do with Pelosi and her agenda and more to do with..............
Yeah, I think this is a mistake. Pelosi's face is political gold for Republicans. The Pelosi/Obama/Reid agenda rhetoric doesn't have to be modified one bit.
I think Dems are politically retarded sometimes.|||she gets sht done..the house passed over 400 progressive bills that the GOP filibustered in the senate..just because a bunch of conservative house democrats lost, doesnt mean the democratic party is going to move all the way to the right|||EASY! John Boener will be a disaster, be even more unpopular and Nancy will look good.He will be hard up for any popular support among the people. You know that already! I bet you're a cinch to beat in poker with these dumb bluffs!|||-Because She's been a LOT like UPS for the Democratic Party. -Whatever You may Think of her, -she always "Delivers." So she's gonna be with Us for a LONG time, yet... ..|||I really don't know, I also don't understand how the Republicans are supporting Bohner. Both Parties are showing there pure insanity and I don't see how anyone can support either.|||It proves the dimocrats don't listen to the people, they really do believe that a liberal thats never ventured outside of New Jersey knows whats best for someone living on the Texas Mexico border..|||They want the most far fetched lunatic nut that they can think of to be their face and voice. She qualifies|||I am assuming they think she will push through some more garbage while she is in there...what they don't get is...we will be sweeping out her and the rest of their trash come 2012..|||Maybe they're afraid she has voodoo dolls of everyone.|||I hope so, it means the GOP will take even more seat in 2012.|||She kicks John Bon-er's as* any time
But enough are convinced that losing 60 House seats had little do with Pelosi and her agenda and more to do with..............
Yeah, I think this is a mistake. Pelosi's face is political gold for Republicans. The Pelosi/Obama/Reid agenda rhetoric doesn't have to be modified one bit.
I think Dems are politically retarded sometimes.|||she gets sht done..the house passed over 400 progressive bills that the GOP filibustered in the senate..just because a bunch of conservative house democrats lost, doesnt mean the democratic party is going to move all the way to the right|||EASY! John Boener will be a disaster, be even more unpopular and Nancy will look good.He will be hard up for any popular support among the people. You know that already! I bet you're a cinch to beat in poker with these dumb bluffs!|||-Because She's been a LOT like UPS for the Democratic Party. -Whatever You may Think of her, -she always "Delivers." So she's gonna be with Us for a LONG time, yet... ..|||I really don't know, I also don't understand how the Republicans are supporting Bohner. Both Parties are showing there pure insanity and I don't see how anyone can support either.|||It proves the dimocrats don't listen to the people, they really do believe that a liberal thats never ventured outside of New Jersey knows whats best for someone living on the Texas Mexico border..|||They want the most far fetched lunatic nut that they can think of to be their face and voice. She qualifies|||I am assuming they think she will push through some more garbage while she is in there...what they don't get is...we will be sweeping out her and the rest of their trash come 2012..|||Maybe they're afraid she has voodoo dolls of everyone.|||I hope so, it means the GOP will take even more seat in 2012.|||She kicks John Bon-er's as* any time
In Switzerland, Turkish Labour Party leader whose name Perincek is judged by Swiss Court. What do you think ?
Dogu Perincek is a leader of Turkish Labour Party. He said that, 'So-called Armenian Genocide is a lie' . What about freedom of thought ?
Is this Europa ? Why do people wear 'Horse-Glasses' ?
I am curiosly your answer.
Kind Regards|||Europa is talking about that there is no independence of ideas in turkiye [because of 301. law which says a person who insults turkiye or turks, are punished], while they have such kind of laws, even also they get involved about the so-called genocide which is nothing to do with them. So, where is the indepedence of ideas in Europa?
Perincek has gone to Switzerland with many documents which show that there is no genocide and turks have been killed by armenians, too. if someone says there is armenian genocide, s/he has to say there is turkish genocide, too. Even turkish archieves are open and turks doesnt take these claims seriously, many people believe in the genocide so that in their country armenians talk about a so-called genocide so much.
Why those countries accept this nonsense thing by their courts or laws and dont let historians talk about it?
This is the ignorance of big, modern and improved Europa. Or this is a politic effort against turkiye...
Turkish law constitution has been modelled from Switzerland's, so what about that also?|||DOGU PERINCEK IS A VICTIM OF EUROPEAN LAWS "DO NOT TELL THE TRUTH" OR YOU WILL BE JAILED......
NO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ITS A LIE OF PEOPLE WHO SEEKS MONEY AND LAND.........|||A dear friend of my family was an orphan survivor of the Armenian genocide. He found refuge here in the USA, so you cannot tell me it did not happen.
It is a bad habit of the Turkish establishment to deny that the Armenian genocide ever happened. You may remember that the Turkish Armenian Hrant Dink was prosecuted in Turkey for asserting the reality of the Armenian genocide, and was then murdered for telling this truth.
I don't think that Perincek will be murdered in Switzerland, whatever he may say.
I am from USA, and I think free speech is essential. I have always felt that in the free market-place of ideas, the truth will come out.
Therefore, I would not favor laws against denying a well-known genocide, as idiotic and evil as this denial is.
Still, I understand the European point of view; they are afraid the horror of the Jewish holocaust could be repeated.
I don't know if you are aware of this, but Hitler used the success of the Armenian genocide to justify his genocide against the Jews. "You don't hear any complaints about the Armenians anymore, do you?" He thought that if Turkey could get away with the Armenian genocide, he could get away with killin all the Jews.|||First of all,it is illogical to blame an empire for being racist.Racism within the boundaries of an empire is far removed from the social science,because the subjects and accordingly the administration of an empire is made up from various nations,creeds and cultures.For that reason,almost all of the eminent rulers of the Ottoman Empire were of Greek,Serbian,Jewish,etc.Racism would be the main cause for the empire to split up.What happened was this:some Armenian armed groups, financed by the the Allied, supported the Allied Forces,yet the Ottoman Empire took the German side at WW 1.The Ottoman Empire drove the Armenian population to Syria,which was a province of the Ottomans then,as a precaution just like American administration collected Japanese immigrants in the camps during the American-Japanese war and like Stalin drove Turkic peoples to the inner part of Russia from the borders of the Ottoman Empire(my grandparents fled to Anatolia then,but all of their relatives were expelled to Kazakhistan and my grandparents never saw them again).Today,the toll during the journey to Syria is assumed to be a genocide by many European states,but they ignore thousands of Azerbaijani civilians killed by Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh.The worst of all,the court that was set up for the war crimes commited by the Serbs in Bosnia verdicted that what Serbs did to Bosnians was not a genocide.(8000 Bosnian men were killed only in the small town of Serebrenica by Serbs)excluding the other towns and the women and girls systematically raped by Serbs.|||Freedom of thought. Sure you are free to think whatever you want. Just as free as I am too. That mean if you express an idea I should be able to express my view about it too.
Here is question a man is standing in graveyard and says there are no dead people. Is free to say that.
What are Horse-Glasses anyways.
As free thought goes the West should be free to call all Muslims terrorists right under free though.|||It is a shame on Switzerland to convict someone who speaks of the truth. This reminds me of Europe in dark ages.
Look at what the lady from US writes above - she and many people like her are so convinced of a genocide that they don't even want to hear anything else, like they have been there and recorded events. I don't even think majority of these people with 'horse glasses' researched the issue or even dared to listen to those before ruthlessly accusing their ancestors of a crime like genocide. Power of propaganda amazes me.
You are free to belive whatever you want to believe, but it gets dangerous when they start convicting, attempting to silence others that don't think like them. In Switzerland, world might be going back to being 'flat' again.|||The truth has a way of coming out .And there will always be nut cases around
Is this Europa ? Why do people wear 'Horse-Glasses' ?
I am curiosly your answer.
Kind Regards|||Europa is talking about that there is no independence of ideas in turkiye [because of 301. law which says a person who insults turkiye or turks, are punished], while they have such kind of laws, even also they get involved about the so-called genocide which is nothing to do with them. So, where is the indepedence of ideas in Europa?
Perincek has gone to Switzerland with many documents which show that there is no genocide and turks have been killed by armenians, too. if someone says there is armenian genocide, s/he has to say there is turkish genocide, too. Even turkish archieves are open and turks doesnt take these claims seriously, many people believe in the genocide so that in their country armenians talk about a so-called genocide so much.
Why those countries accept this nonsense thing by their courts or laws and dont let historians talk about it?
This is the ignorance of big, modern and improved Europa. Or this is a politic effort against turkiye...
Turkish law constitution has been modelled from Switzerland's, so what about that also?|||DOGU PERINCEK IS A VICTIM OF EUROPEAN LAWS "DO NOT TELL THE TRUTH" OR YOU WILL BE JAILED......
NO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ITS A LIE OF PEOPLE WHO SEEKS MONEY AND LAND.........|||A dear friend of my family was an orphan survivor of the Armenian genocide. He found refuge here in the USA, so you cannot tell me it did not happen.
It is a bad habit of the Turkish establishment to deny that the Armenian genocide ever happened. You may remember that the Turkish Armenian Hrant Dink was prosecuted in Turkey for asserting the reality of the Armenian genocide, and was then murdered for telling this truth.
I don't think that Perincek will be murdered in Switzerland, whatever he may say.
I am from USA, and I think free speech is essential. I have always felt that in the free market-place of ideas, the truth will come out.
Therefore, I would not favor laws against denying a well-known genocide, as idiotic and evil as this denial is.
Still, I understand the European point of view; they are afraid the horror of the Jewish holocaust could be repeated.
I don't know if you are aware of this, but Hitler used the success of the Armenian genocide to justify his genocide against the Jews. "You don't hear any complaints about the Armenians anymore, do you?" He thought that if Turkey could get away with the Armenian genocide, he could get away with killin all the Jews.|||First of all,it is illogical to blame an empire for being racist.Racism within the boundaries of an empire is far removed from the social science,because the subjects and accordingly the administration of an empire is made up from various nations,creeds and cultures.For that reason,almost all of the eminent rulers of the Ottoman Empire were of Greek,Serbian,Jewish,etc.Racism would be the main cause for the empire to split up.What happened was this:some Armenian armed groups, financed by the the Allied, supported the Allied Forces,yet the Ottoman Empire took the German side at WW 1.The Ottoman Empire drove the Armenian population to Syria,which was a province of the Ottomans then,as a precaution just like American administration collected Japanese immigrants in the camps during the American-Japanese war and like Stalin drove Turkic peoples to the inner part of Russia from the borders of the Ottoman Empire(my grandparents fled to Anatolia then,but all of their relatives were expelled to Kazakhistan and my grandparents never saw them again).Today,the toll during the journey to Syria is assumed to be a genocide by many European states,but they ignore thousands of Azerbaijani civilians killed by Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh.The worst of all,the court that was set up for the war crimes commited by the Serbs in Bosnia verdicted that what Serbs did to Bosnians was not a genocide.(8000 Bosnian men were killed only in the small town of Serebrenica by Serbs)excluding the other towns and the women and girls systematically raped by Serbs.|||Freedom of thought. Sure you are free to think whatever you want. Just as free as I am too. That mean if you express an idea I should be able to express my view about it too.
Here is question a man is standing in graveyard and says there are no dead people. Is free to say that.
What are Horse-Glasses anyways.
As free thought goes the West should be free to call all Muslims terrorists right under free though.|||It is a shame on Switzerland to convict someone who speaks of the truth. This reminds me of Europe in dark ages.
Look at what the lady from US writes above - she and many people like her are so convinced of a genocide that they don't even want to hear anything else, like they have been there and recorded events. I don't even think majority of these people with 'horse glasses' researched the issue or even dared to listen to those before ruthlessly accusing their ancestors of a crime like genocide. Power of propaganda amazes me.
You are free to belive whatever you want to believe, but it gets dangerous when they start convicting, attempting to silence others that don't think like them. In Switzerland, world might be going back to being 'flat' again.|||The truth has a way of coming out .And there will always be nut cases around
How do you creat your own match when you the party leader on gta 4 on xbox 360 on xbox live?
how do you creat your own match when you the party leader on gta 4 on xbox 360 on xbox live|||1. Go to phone
2. Go to multi-player
3. go to player match
4. go to Any Game Mode
5. go to private slots
6. go to 1 PRIVATE SLOT
7. Start Game
8. VOILA you are host!!! mess about with game settings and HAVE FUN!|||idk...but im geting xbox live on friday or saturday :D and a new tv and i love gta4 and i have elite and halo 3
2. Go to multi-player
3. go to player match
4. go to Any Game Mode
5. go to private slots
6. go to 1 PRIVATE SLOT
7. Start Game
8. VOILA you are host!!! mess about with game settings and HAVE FUN!|||idk...but im geting xbox live on friday or saturday :D and a new tv and i love gta4 and i have elite and halo 3
What are three reasons why a Majority Party's leader might select a person to be a committee chair?
I think one reason would be the Seniority system, though I am not sure.|||Democrat Party uses seniority.
Republican Party used seniority but had a 6 year limit on holding the chairmanship.
Republican Party used seniority but had a 6 year limit on holding the chairmanship.
Did Cheney just admit that Rush Limbaugh really is a republican party leader?
Yup, he hedged a little, but then came out for Rush in the end.
SCHEIFFER: Colin Powell said Republicans would be better off if they didn鈥檛 have Rush Limbaugh out speaking for them. Where do you come down?
CHENEY: Well, if I had to choose in terms of being a Republican, I鈥檇 go with Rush Limbaugh, I think. I think my take on it was Colin had already left the party. I didn鈥檛 know he was still a Republican.
SCHIEFFER: So you think that he鈥檚 not a Republican?
CHENEY: I just noted he endorsed the Democratic candidate for president this time, Barack Obama . I assumed that that is some indication of his loyalty and his interest.
SCHIEFFER: And you said you would take Rush Limbaugh over Colin Powell.
CHENEY: I would.
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?do鈥?/a>
SCHEIFFER: Colin Powell said Republicans would be better off if they didn鈥檛 have Rush Limbaugh out speaking for them. Where do you come down?
CHENEY: Well, if I had to choose in terms of being a Republican, I鈥檇 go with Rush Limbaugh, I think. I think my take on it was Colin had already left the party. I didn鈥檛 know he was still a Republican.
SCHIEFFER: So you think that he鈥檚 not a Republican?
CHENEY: I just noted he endorsed the Democratic candidate for president this time, Barack Obama . I assumed that that is some indication of his loyalty and his interest.
SCHIEFFER: And you said you would take Rush Limbaugh over Colin Powell.
CHENEY: I would.
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?do鈥?/a>
Was hitler a good leader of his party or did someone else manage the party behind the scenes?
I just want to know because I thought that he was a good speaker and could motivate the people but he did not know how to manage the party. Am I correct?|||As of 11/27/2009 four answers in and no one seems capable of giving you an answer. Weird.
That said. Yes Hitler can be cited as a 'good' leader of his party and it can be argued that it was his party ("It;s My Party and I'll Goose Step if I Want To." Lesslie Gore, 1964).
In 1919 Adolf Hitler was floundering. He had found a sense of 'calling' by serving in the German Army in The Great War, but with the war ending in defeat, Hitler was uncertain what to do only knowing he did not want to return to work as a self employed artist (the pay sucked and the benefits were not all that great). The Army, in tatters after its defeat, yet wanting to have a say in post war Germany, decided to send Hitler to investigate a small political party then named the 'German Worker's Party.' Then as Now, in Germany as in America, the word 'workers' conjured up images of commies intent on communizing the country.
INSTEAD, Hitler found a group of well meaning but doddering 'old' men who were vaguely socialist, virulently Nationalist (think Sarah Palin), and anti-Semetic. Hitler not only joined the party, he transformed it. Hitler got rid of the word 'Workers,' coming up with the nifty National Socialist Party, which implied Nationalism, Socialism (which was not all that bad in Germany at the time) and as History has proved, the abbreviation, NAZI was catchy memorable and formidable. Hitler conjored up all sorts of tricks: example, let up say you joined u, the fifty third person to do so, well guess what, your membership card showed than you were the ONE THOUSANTH and Fifty Third Member, wow this is one big party. HITLER came up with the FLAG, and all sorts of details (he was an artist, after all), and Hitler retained those members who were effective in their jobs, while adding former Army contacts who helped to make the NAZI party into an effective organization.
In short, Hitler was good behind the scenes, effectively transforming it; after time, Hitler did grow lazy, once he had the right henchmen in place he let them manage the party, though his was the final word, especially when others (the Strassers in particular) thought that the NAZI Party was a Political Party and not Hitler's Personal Party (again think Palin). So though Hitler became the face and especially the voice of the NAZI Party, he did pull the strings and push the buttons.
One of the best sites out there:
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GER鈥?/a>
""In 1919 Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder and Dietrich Eckart formed the German Worker's Party (GPW) in Munich. The German Army was worried that it was a left-wing revolutionary group and sent Adolf Hitler, one of its education officers, to spy on the organization. Hitler discovered that the party's political ideas were similar to his own. He approved of Drexler's German nationalism and anti-Semitism but was unimpressed with the way the party was organized. Although there as a spy, Hitler could not restrain himself when a member made a point he disagreed with, and he stood up and made a passionate speech on the subject.
Anton Drexler was impressed with Hitler's abilities as an orator and invited him to join the party. At first Hitler was reluctant, but urged on by his commanding officer, Captain Karl Mayr, he eventually agreed. He was only the fifty-fourth person to join the German Worker's Party. Hitler was immediately asked to join the executive committee and was later appointed the party's propaganda manager.
In the next few weeks Hitler brought several members of his army into the party, including one of his commanding officers, Captain Ernst Roehm. The arrival of Roehm was an important development as he had access to the army political fund and was able to transfer some of the money into the GWP.
The German Worker's Party used some of this money to advertise their meetings. Adolf Hitler was often the main speaker and it was during this period that he developed the techniques that made him into such a persuasive orator.
Hitler's reputation as an orator grew and it soon became clear that he was the main reason why people were joining the party. This gave Hitler tremendous power within the organization as they knew they could not afford to lose him.
In April, 1920, Hitler advocated that the party should change its name to the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP). Hitler had always been hostile to socialist ideas, especially those that involved racial or sexual equality. However, socialism was a popular political philosophy in Germany after the First World War. This was reflected in the growth in the German Social Democrat Party (SDP), the largest political party in Germany.
Hitler, therefore redefined socialism by placing the word 'National' before it. He claimed he was only in favour of equality for those who had "German blood". Jews and other "aliens" would lose their rights of citizenship, and immigration of non-Germans should be brought to an end.
In February 1920, the NSD|||Mahalo!
|||***I do not think Hitler was a cool guy, but dismissing him wholesale as an evil maniac does an enormous disservice to the memories of those who fought against him. We must learn as much as we can about him***
Leader, perhaps. Opportunist, definitely.
I cannot speak definitively on his leadership skills, but a glance through his accomplishments during the early years of the party I believe demonstrate an ability to bring the right people into his fold.
In bringing the stamp of fascism to the idea of German nationalism that had been raped at Versailles, Hitler did not act alone. He brought faithful aides to his side, like G枚ring and Himmler, who shared his fanatical views on nationalism to manage the frightful functional aspects of party operations. The upstart Austrian used the revered figures of the Prussian military class, to include none other than President Paul von Hindenburg to ensure the trust of the German people and wrest control of the partisan alliances that would make him Reichskanzler in 1933 and F眉hrer upon Hindenburg's death in 1934.
Once so invested with power, he rode the wave of Weimar innovations such as fixing of the currency to a commodity standard to create his own achievements. Unopposed and victorious military ventures only buttressed the support of those who had placed him in power. I think it is clear from the decapitation efforts against him by his own Army officers during the war show that he was definitely in charge.
You can't argue with Hitler's ability to marshal people and resources to his own benefit while keeping himself firmly on top of the heap.|||Like any leader he had experts help him and heaps of support from Industry which is basically all he worried about once elected as Chancellor. He may have scored a couple of good points to help the people but at the same time he could not be swayed to listen to better advise where it counts.
He was obsessed with power beyond his means and threatened anybody who stood in his way.
His means of gaining manipulative power borders on the fringes of illegalities never seen before in politics as he threatened civil war if he did not get the support he demanded.
With these sorts of practices that distort civil and democratic rights of the people combined with him having literally dissolved (with threats) the oppositional parties it should not have been difficult to be the leader, on top of this Hitler was not really fit to be a leader, his bohemian life style from his early days was carried with him into governing the country. He sat up all hours of the night watching movies and rarely did he ever surpass 2 hours of paperwork in any one day no matter how pressing the situation was.|||Hitler was not exactly someone who would allow somebody else to control him. Whether upfront or behind the scenes. Those that tried didn't retire, if you get my drift.
Hitler was not a good leader, though he did nice things for some of the people.|||Hitler was bad all around!
That said. Yes Hitler can be cited as a 'good' leader of his party and it can be argued that it was his party ("It;s My Party and I'll Goose Step if I Want To." Lesslie Gore, 1964).
In 1919 Adolf Hitler was floundering. He had found a sense of 'calling' by serving in the German Army in The Great War, but with the war ending in defeat, Hitler was uncertain what to do only knowing he did not want to return to work as a self employed artist (the pay sucked and the benefits were not all that great). The Army, in tatters after its defeat, yet wanting to have a say in post war Germany, decided to send Hitler to investigate a small political party then named the 'German Worker's Party.' Then as Now, in Germany as in America, the word 'workers' conjured up images of commies intent on communizing the country.
INSTEAD, Hitler found a group of well meaning but doddering 'old' men who were vaguely socialist, virulently Nationalist (think Sarah Palin), and anti-Semetic. Hitler not only joined the party, he transformed it. Hitler got rid of the word 'Workers,' coming up with the nifty National Socialist Party, which implied Nationalism, Socialism (which was not all that bad in Germany at the time) and as History has proved, the abbreviation, NAZI was catchy memorable and formidable. Hitler conjored up all sorts of tricks: example, let up say you joined u, the fifty third person to do so, well guess what, your membership card showed than you were the ONE THOUSANTH and Fifty Third Member, wow this is one big party. HITLER came up with the FLAG, and all sorts of details (he was an artist, after all), and Hitler retained those members who were effective in their jobs, while adding former Army contacts who helped to make the NAZI party into an effective organization.
In short, Hitler was good behind the scenes, effectively transforming it; after time, Hitler did grow lazy, once he had the right henchmen in place he let them manage the party, though his was the final word, especially when others (the Strassers in particular) thought that the NAZI Party was a Political Party and not Hitler's Personal Party (again think Palin). So though Hitler became the face and especially the voice of the NAZI Party, he did pull the strings and push the buttons.
One of the best sites out there:
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GER鈥?/a>
""In 1919 Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder and Dietrich Eckart formed the German Worker's Party (GPW) in Munich. The German Army was worried that it was a left-wing revolutionary group and sent Adolf Hitler, one of its education officers, to spy on the organization. Hitler discovered that the party's political ideas were similar to his own. He approved of Drexler's German nationalism and anti-Semitism but was unimpressed with the way the party was organized. Although there as a spy, Hitler could not restrain himself when a member made a point he disagreed with, and he stood up and made a passionate speech on the subject.
Anton Drexler was impressed with Hitler's abilities as an orator and invited him to join the party. At first Hitler was reluctant, but urged on by his commanding officer, Captain Karl Mayr, he eventually agreed. He was only the fifty-fourth person to join the German Worker's Party. Hitler was immediately asked to join the executive committee and was later appointed the party's propaganda manager.
In the next few weeks Hitler brought several members of his army into the party, including one of his commanding officers, Captain Ernst Roehm. The arrival of Roehm was an important development as he had access to the army political fund and was able to transfer some of the money into the GWP.
The German Worker's Party used some of this money to advertise their meetings. Adolf Hitler was often the main speaker and it was during this period that he developed the techniques that made him into such a persuasive orator.
Hitler's reputation as an orator grew and it soon became clear that he was the main reason why people were joining the party. This gave Hitler tremendous power within the organization as they knew they could not afford to lose him.
In April, 1920, Hitler advocated that the party should change its name to the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP). Hitler had always been hostile to socialist ideas, especially those that involved racial or sexual equality. However, socialism was a popular political philosophy in Germany after the First World War. This was reflected in the growth in the German Social Democrat Party (SDP), the largest political party in Germany.
Hitler, therefore redefined socialism by placing the word 'National' before it. He claimed he was only in favour of equality for those who had "German blood". Jews and other "aliens" would lose their rights of citizenship, and immigration of non-Germans should be brought to an end.
In February 1920, the NSD|||Mahalo!
Report Abuse
|||***I do not think Hitler was a cool guy, but dismissing him wholesale as an evil maniac does an enormous disservice to the memories of those who fought against him. We must learn as much as we can about him***
Leader, perhaps. Opportunist, definitely.
I cannot speak definitively on his leadership skills, but a glance through his accomplishments during the early years of the party I believe demonstrate an ability to bring the right people into his fold.
In bringing the stamp of fascism to the idea of German nationalism that had been raped at Versailles, Hitler did not act alone. He brought faithful aides to his side, like G枚ring and Himmler, who shared his fanatical views on nationalism to manage the frightful functional aspects of party operations. The upstart Austrian used the revered figures of the Prussian military class, to include none other than President Paul von Hindenburg to ensure the trust of the German people and wrest control of the partisan alliances that would make him Reichskanzler in 1933 and F眉hrer upon Hindenburg's death in 1934.
Once so invested with power, he rode the wave of Weimar innovations such as fixing of the currency to a commodity standard to create his own achievements. Unopposed and victorious military ventures only buttressed the support of those who had placed him in power. I think it is clear from the decapitation efforts against him by his own Army officers during the war show that he was definitely in charge.
You can't argue with Hitler's ability to marshal people and resources to his own benefit while keeping himself firmly on top of the heap.|||Like any leader he had experts help him and heaps of support from Industry which is basically all he worried about once elected as Chancellor. He may have scored a couple of good points to help the people but at the same time he could not be swayed to listen to better advise where it counts.
He was obsessed with power beyond his means and threatened anybody who stood in his way.
His means of gaining manipulative power borders on the fringes of illegalities never seen before in politics as he threatened civil war if he did not get the support he demanded.
With these sorts of practices that distort civil and democratic rights of the people combined with him having literally dissolved (with threats) the oppositional parties it should not have been difficult to be the leader, on top of this Hitler was not really fit to be a leader, his bohemian life style from his early days was carried with him into governing the country. He sat up all hours of the night watching movies and rarely did he ever surpass 2 hours of paperwork in any one day no matter how pressing the situation was.|||Hitler was not exactly someone who would allow somebody else to control him. Whether upfront or behind the scenes. Those that tried didn't retire, if you get my drift.
Hitler was not a good leader, though he did nice things for some of the people.|||Hitler was bad all around!
What is the term of Senate Minority Leader? what is the budget for the minority party?
What is the term of Senate Minority Leader? what is the budget for the minority party?
Also- what is their role in congress? Does the senate minority leader have support staff or assistants? how many?|||1/3 of the Senate is up for election every two years. The party (Democrat/Republican) that has the most members, is the majority. So the Senate minority leader could become the Senate majority leader, if his/her party takes control after 2 years.
They are the party leader that attempts to get other party members to vote along the party line.
All Senators have a staff and assistants. The majority and minority leaders both have "whips" (party members elected as whips) who are the ones who work with party members inividually to get them to vote with the party.
Also- what is their role in congress? Does the senate minority leader have support staff or assistants? how many?|||1/3 of the Senate is up for election every two years. The party (Democrat/Republican) that has the most members, is the majority. So the Senate minority leader could become the Senate majority leader, if his/her party takes control after 2 years.
They are the party leader that attempts to get other party members to vote along the party line.
All Senators have a staff and assistants. The majority and minority leaders both have "whips" (party members elected as whips) who are the ones who work with party members inividually to get them to vote with the party.
What percentage of Australian voters vote for the party and what percentage for the leader?
I mean what would agree with Tony Abbotts analogy "same product different saleman"
Obviously many in the labor party would not as they changed leaders and then had an election called almost immediately|||The leader of the Liberal Party is Tony Abbott and his electorate is Warringah. He has to be elected to parliament for that electorate and after that his colleagues in Parliament - both the House of Representatives and the Senate choose him as Leader of the Opposition.
The same applied to Julia Gillard - She was elected by the electors for the seat of Lalor and then chosen by her Labor colleagues as leader of the Parliamentary Labor party and therefore Prime Minister.
The percentage of Australian voters voting Labor was 50.4% or 5,410,236 votes and those voting Liberal was 49.6% or 5,325,027 votes. Check http://vtr.aec.gov.au/.
The leaders - Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott will only have got the votes that they received in their own electorate.
Tony Abbott's Results in Warringah
http://vtr.aec.gov.au/HouseDivisionFirst鈥?/a>
Julia Gillard's results in Lalor
http://vtr.aec.gov.au/HouseDivisionFirst鈥?/a>
I hope that this information helps to answer your question.
Cheers!!!|||People vote based on what they are presented with. Despite the fact that they technically do not vote for a leader, but for a representative and senators, many vote based on the way the leader presents and is presented.
Obviously many in the labor party would not as they changed leaders and then had an election called almost immediately|||The leader of the Liberal Party is Tony Abbott and his electorate is Warringah. He has to be elected to parliament for that electorate and after that his colleagues in Parliament - both the House of Representatives and the Senate choose him as Leader of the Opposition.
The same applied to Julia Gillard - She was elected by the electors for the seat of Lalor and then chosen by her Labor colleagues as leader of the Parliamentary Labor party and therefore Prime Minister.
The percentage of Australian voters voting Labor was 50.4% or 5,410,236 votes and those voting Liberal was 49.6% or 5,325,027 votes. Check http://vtr.aec.gov.au/.
The leaders - Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott will only have got the votes that they received in their own electorate.
Tony Abbott's Results in Warringah
http://vtr.aec.gov.au/HouseDivisionFirst鈥?/a>
Julia Gillard's results in Lalor
http://vtr.aec.gov.au/HouseDivisionFirst鈥?/a>
I hope that this information helps to answer your question.
Cheers!!!|||People vote based on what they are presented with. Despite the fact that they technically do not vote for a leader, but for a representative and senators, many vote based on the way the leader presents and is presented.
Has Glen Beck overtaken Rush Limbaugh for Republican Party leader?
This is ranking cockroaches.
If so, then they will lose by even bigger margins.
God, I miss legitimate conservatives. Where are the ones who had actual ideas? I mean, these slime are beneath contempt.|||I am just going to point out that Beck at least claims that he is an Independent that commonly votes libertarian or independent and was on CNN bashing the crap out of the leftist Bush Administration before he joined FOX...I am just going to point that out. I don't think that Limbaugh ever wanted to be the leader of the Republicans and I am pretty sure that he doesn't pretend to be. I can't speak for the Republicans, because I am not one, but I would assume that it is a politician that leads that party.
Give his show a chance, Open-Minded, Open-Minders! He is just making points about the crooked administration that is full of commies. If you like it, cool. If not, go back to watch TMZ and Flavor of Love.|||Seeing as Glen Beck is a Libertarian I would have to say no.
Rush Limbaugh has stated time and again he does not want the leadership of the party that he belongs to and last I read and heard it was Micheal Steele that was the Republican Party leader.
As for my self I am an Independent and will stay that way.|||Beck is an independent with libertarian leanings.
Beck often bashed Bush, when he worked at CNN
But I do find it amusing that some liberals don't know the difference between a political pundit and a politician.
For the uninformed: The pundit only opines, but has no ability to legislate change, while the politician has the power to legislate change over the lives of U.S. citizens.|||Uh Oh...Looks like Beck is on the way out now that sponsors are dropping him. Look how many of his former supporters on here are now claiming he is not a republican, but a libertarian.
What a great example of the intellectual dishonesty of the right!!!|||Beck is a Libertarian. I will repeat that so you might remember that it is not the same as a Republican. Beck is a Libertarian.|||NO PALIN is the Queen Bee in the Republican Party...Palin, Limbaugh and Beck...that's sad!
and Beck (regardless what he claims to be) is far from being Independent
oh yeah, I forgot about Michael Steele..LMAO, those guys are hurting badly!|||Mr. Beck is a Libertarian, he has announced it on his radio shows and his TV shows. he leans to the right a little bit and so do I and I'm an Independent|||Glenn is a libertarian and libs have no clue about politics or who stands for what. Rush is a entertainer and Beck works on a talk show and is informing the public of the truth!|||Neither Rush nor Beck are polticians...They are radio/television personalities
No wonder you guys voted for Obama...You can't tell the difference between a celebrity and a political leader
Explains a lot...Thanks|||It appears that many conservatives are giving him credence now. I guess that goes to show us that they actually enjoy the over the top hatred. How proud those types of conservatives must be.|||He is an independent he was not very happy with several Bush policies you must have just started listening to him since President Obama was elected.|||Uhhhhhhhhhh, Well If you put all of these clowns in one room with the RNC leader steele, then It would be a room of retards playing poker in the dark.|||Don't be ridiculous. As long as Limbaugh lives, his ego will never allow anyone to take his place.|||Sure looks like it doesn't it. I guess puffer fish Limbaugh is either taking a break, or recharging his hot breath up for later.|||Did you have something of substance that you wanted to ask?
______________________________
Hi John! Anymore questions tonight??? LMAO!|||Republicans do not have leaders. The elect representitives and they listen to people that have simialr views.|||From the way all Republican seem to worship and idolize him, I would say yes.|||He is saving the country from liars and communist...He is the only one speaking out...|||If the GOP is looking to talk radio for their next leader then they are really in trouble.|||yes they like his Chalk board he makes Pictures so all Republicans can understand|||Seems that way, I guess the loonier the person the more Repubs worship at their feet.|||He's overtaken Rush in bug nut crazy that's for sure.|||Glenn is a libertarian these days so no.|||Glenn Beck is not even a Republican.
LMAO|||They are both totally nuts so who cares.|||They are just commentators....lol...wow, wake up|||Doubtful Glen Beck is just another mouth piece for the government there is a truth in advertising law... too bad there is no truth in politics law. I have listened to Glen Beck on many occasions and find him to be the equivalent of a double agent, he spouts many things in public to arouse mistrust and foment confusion on behalf of the very people he denigrates. This allows him to help the government weed out undesirable attitudes by his helping them to surface.|||The Libertarian party is going to replace the Republican party.
Ron Paul is going to run as a Republican in 2012 and win.
He's the most conservative politician on the planet.
Theres no doubt hes going to win.|||Sometimes there are just one too many chainsaws鈥?|||I think he's at least tied him as world's biggest gasbag.
If so, then they will lose by even bigger margins.
God, I miss legitimate conservatives. Where are the ones who had actual ideas? I mean, these slime are beneath contempt.|||I am just going to point out that Beck at least claims that he is an Independent that commonly votes libertarian or independent and was on CNN bashing the crap out of the leftist Bush Administration before he joined FOX...I am just going to point that out. I don't think that Limbaugh ever wanted to be the leader of the Republicans and I am pretty sure that he doesn't pretend to be. I can't speak for the Republicans, because I am not one, but I would assume that it is a politician that leads that party.
Give his show a chance, Open-Minded, Open-Minders! He is just making points about the crooked administration that is full of commies. If you like it, cool. If not, go back to watch TMZ and Flavor of Love.|||Seeing as Glen Beck is a Libertarian I would have to say no.
Rush Limbaugh has stated time and again he does not want the leadership of the party that he belongs to and last I read and heard it was Micheal Steele that was the Republican Party leader.
As for my self I am an Independent and will stay that way.|||Beck is an independent with libertarian leanings.
Beck often bashed Bush, when he worked at CNN
But I do find it amusing that some liberals don't know the difference between a political pundit and a politician.
For the uninformed: The pundit only opines, but has no ability to legislate change, while the politician has the power to legislate change over the lives of U.S. citizens.|||Uh Oh...Looks like Beck is on the way out now that sponsors are dropping him. Look how many of his former supporters on here are now claiming he is not a republican, but a libertarian.
What a great example of the intellectual dishonesty of the right!!!|||Beck is a Libertarian. I will repeat that so you might remember that it is not the same as a Republican. Beck is a Libertarian.|||NO PALIN is the Queen Bee in the Republican Party...Palin, Limbaugh and Beck...that's sad!
and Beck (regardless what he claims to be) is far from being Independent
oh yeah, I forgot about Michael Steele..LMAO, those guys are hurting badly!|||Mr. Beck is a Libertarian, he has announced it on his radio shows and his TV shows. he leans to the right a little bit and so do I and I'm an Independent|||Glenn is a libertarian and libs have no clue about politics or who stands for what. Rush is a entertainer and Beck works on a talk show and is informing the public of the truth!|||Neither Rush nor Beck are polticians...They are radio/television personalities
No wonder you guys voted for Obama...You can't tell the difference between a celebrity and a political leader
Explains a lot...Thanks|||It appears that many conservatives are giving him credence now. I guess that goes to show us that they actually enjoy the over the top hatred. How proud those types of conservatives must be.|||He is an independent he was not very happy with several Bush policies you must have just started listening to him since President Obama was elected.|||Uhhhhhhhhhh, Well If you put all of these clowns in one room with the RNC leader steele, then It would be a room of retards playing poker in the dark.|||Don't be ridiculous. As long as Limbaugh lives, his ego will never allow anyone to take his place.|||Sure looks like it doesn't it. I guess puffer fish Limbaugh is either taking a break, or recharging his hot breath up for later.|||Did you have something of substance that you wanted to ask?
______________________________
Hi John! Anymore questions tonight??? LMAO!|||Republicans do not have leaders. The elect representitives and they listen to people that have simialr views.|||From the way all Republican seem to worship and idolize him, I would say yes.|||He is saving the country from liars and communist...He is the only one speaking out...|||If the GOP is looking to talk radio for their next leader then they are really in trouble.|||yes they like his Chalk board he makes Pictures so all Republicans can understand|||Seems that way, I guess the loonier the person the more Repubs worship at their feet.|||He's overtaken Rush in bug nut crazy that's for sure.|||Glenn is a libertarian these days so no.|||Glenn Beck is not even a Republican.
LMAO|||They are both totally nuts so who cares.|||They are just commentators....lol...wow, wake up|||Doubtful Glen Beck is just another mouth piece for the government there is a truth in advertising law... too bad there is no truth in politics law. I have listened to Glen Beck on many occasions and find him to be the equivalent of a double agent, he spouts many things in public to arouse mistrust and foment confusion on behalf of the very people he denigrates. This allows him to help the government weed out undesirable attitudes by his helping them to surface.|||The Libertarian party is going to replace the Republican party.
Ron Paul is going to run as a Republican in 2012 and win.
He's the most conservative politician on the planet.
Theres no doubt hes going to win.|||Sometimes there are just one too many chainsaws鈥?|||I think he's at least tied him as world's biggest gasbag.
What are the qualities that make COMRADE OBAMA such a great party leader and above the rest in Washington?
Thank you
Comrade DINO|||He is by far, the greatest divider this country has ever known..|||It would appear that he leads the country better than he leads his own party. He needs to get the blue dogs do what's best for all of us, not just their own small corner of the world.|||none.|||don;t make me sick.
Comrade DINO|||He is by far, the greatest divider this country has ever known..|||It would appear that he leads the country better than he leads his own party. He needs to get the blue dogs do what's best for all of us, not just their own small corner of the world.|||none.|||don;t make me sick.
Who do you think is the leader of the democrat party and why?
Like President Bush leads the Republican Party right now.
But after 08 he will be out and the party will have a new leader either the new Republican President or some one else if the democrats win in 08
Also who would you say is the leader of the Liberal and Conservative Movements?|||THE CLINTON'S -with( move on dot org )who yells jump -they say how high|||Kaiser Sose|||Pelosi is the highest ranking democrat, so I believe that makes her the Party leader. If the Republicans lose the whitehouse in '08, and fail to take either the house or senate in that same election, then the Senate Minority leader would lead the GOP.
Harry Reid is Senate Majority leader, and certainly an influential figure, but since the VP Presides over the Senate the Congressional Majority leader actually holds a little more power (and therefore rank) than her Senate counterpart.|||Pelosi and Harry Reid haven't yet proven themselves as congressional leaders. Hillary's candidacy prevents Bill from being the leader.
I'd say Howard Dean. Behind the scenes he's doing a great deal at the DNC to strengthen the Democrat Party.|||They don't have any one leader. I would say Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, Clinton, Schummer, Dean, Edwards, Gore, Clinton have pretty much been the spokesman for the party.
The leading Liberals: See above. Add the mainstream press and the Hollywood dolts.
Leading Conservatives are still Limbaugh, Gingrich, Coulter, Hannity, Savage. National Review.
But after 08 he will be out and the party will have a new leader either the new Republican President or some one else if the democrats win in 08
Also who would you say is the leader of the Liberal and Conservative Movements?|||THE CLINTON'S -with( move on dot org )who yells jump -they say how high|||Kaiser Sose|||Pelosi is the highest ranking democrat, so I believe that makes her the Party leader. If the Republicans lose the whitehouse in '08, and fail to take either the house or senate in that same election, then the Senate Minority leader would lead the GOP.
Harry Reid is Senate Majority leader, and certainly an influential figure, but since the VP Presides over the Senate the Congressional Majority leader actually holds a little more power (and therefore rank) than her Senate counterpart.|||Pelosi and Harry Reid haven't yet proven themselves as congressional leaders. Hillary's candidacy prevents Bill from being the leader.
I'd say Howard Dean. Behind the scenes he's doing a great deal at the DNC to strengthen the Democrat Party.|||They don't have any one leader. I would say Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, Clinton, Schummer, Dean, Edwards, Gore, Clinton have pretty much been the spokesman for the party.
The leading Liberals: See above. Add the mainstream press and the Hollywood dolts.
Leading Conservatives are still Limbaugh, Gingrich, Coulter, Hannity, Savage. National Review.
When Will Republican Party ELECT A Non-White Person as Their Leader?
Do you think it can happen anytime soon? Can they ELECT and non-white person (especially a black person) as the leader of their party, like how they did for John McCain recently?|||HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
They had a GREAT candidate in Colin Powell - until they USED him to tell their lies about Iraq and destroyed his credibility totally.
Just like they have been USING Condi. I personally can't stand her, but she's just their "token" and with her they get two in one (black %26amp; female) - then they have her write a resolution and then tell her not to vote on it. (and of course she OBEYS)
I can see you don't spend much time around "Republicans". Their idea of "politically correct" is to let one in the room, they don't get to speak of course, but they let them in the room, what MORE do you want?
Truly, you don't expect them to ACTUALLY fraternize now do you?
How do you think Palin got where she got - an airhead, a not bad looking airhead token they would have used to get the WH, but do you think for one second she would have had a FRACTION of the power Cheney had? She was supposed to excite, help them win, and then go home and take care of her 5 kids. Why do you think they were so surprised that she didn't win the election for them? We were just supposed to LOOK at her and listen to the Rove BS, NOT actually interview her. Look, they gave us a FEMALE to vote for, it matters not that she didn't know her head from a hole in the ground, she was female that (in their small minds) should have taken the Hillary voters and clinched it for them.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
The party of the red-necked "superior" bigot with a person of color/female telling THEM what to do?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
ROFL, I just can't stop laughing.
Oh, to answer your question, not in our lifetime, or our childrens, or even our grandchildrens.
edit:
enter name here
Ya'll TWICE elected a white incompetant IDIOT that had NO command of the English language, why should HAVING command of the language stop a minority?|||Sure. Bobby Jindahl is right on target for 2012.|||They have,,,Republican Condi Rice, Secretary of State, she was the highest ranking black female in history before Obama.
Unlike the Democrats, Republicans prefer to elect according to ideals,experience,and accomplishments, rather then elect by race or gender.|||As soon as one comes along that has political views that are conservative.
Addition: I guess you could interpret "Conservative" to mean "Competent."|||I would prefer that our priorities would be a conservative, regardless of race.|||Yes they can and would have if Sec Rice would have ran.|||thompson and palin 2012|||Bobby Jindal will be that person in 2012|||I don't see that happening in the for see-able future.|||Retarded Idiot does not = White = Bush|||I like Condoleeza Rice.|||Did you miss the TIDAL WAVE of support we had for Condi Rice???
She DIDN'T WANT to be President.....a fact that O-sham-a must be VERY thankful for.
With her education, upbringing, experience, and credentials, she would be a SLAM DUNK winner (in my opinion).
We also like Michael Steele and I happen to like Dr. Alan Keyes because he is a Constitutional SCHOLAR.|||24 years after the Democrats ran a female Vice-President candidate the Republicans had Palin.
So I guess about another 24 years.|||Republicans don't elect people based on their skin color, there is no need to elect someone simply because they're not white. Rev. Wright isn't white but he's not right (not in the head anyway).|||I don't know...maybe Colin Powell...if they move more to the center.
I could consider voting for him.|||go to any republican gathering and you can count the non whites on one hand. The republican party is made up of all whites, while the democrats are all-inclusive. So which party is more inclusive? And a token black republican is just that--a token.|||When there is a competant one that wants to serve in such a position.... We don't just elect people of minorities for the sheer fact they are a part of a minority... Our political and election process should not be subject to affirmative action and that whomever has a color to their skin should be elected because they happened to master the English Language... :/
I would like to see Bobby Jindal go farther... as well as others... but they have to WANT to do it too...
BTW: I know more Mexicans and Hispanics that are Conservative and Republican than I know white people that are...|||WHO CARES what color someone is ? shouldnt we elect our president according to his qualifications and his beliefs? I thought we are not supposed to judge people on the color of their skin so the republicans should nominate the best person { black,white,male,female] for the job.|||HA HA HA HA|||who knows? who cares?
Today I deal with the here and now ~
added to next poster. bush was not competent. He is a warmonger. A man who believes himself to be God.
So there were no more attacks against the US ~ un hum
why not, you ask?
because of bush, you answer.
Not me.
Because you see, no one R~E~A~L~L~Y knows who was responsible for 911. but I will say this. There is no way that a big overgrown arab named Osama binLaden ~living in a cage, could have masterminded the exact timing, the preciseness, the too-well put together tragedies of 911. No way.|||As soon as the Democrats "elect" a competent leader.|||OK.....since a person's skin color is the most important attribute you look for when picking a leader......who does this? Oh yeah, Democrats.
Gotta love "progressives"......lol|||I hope to see Rice in that race next time. We will then have a women and she will be of color!|||Michael Steele will probably be the leader of the GOP very soon. Alan Keyes ran for President this year however the Democrats choose our candidate for us. You do realize 18 million Democrats voted against Obama in the Primaries don't you?|||I am personally a Colin Powell fan! I am really hoping to see him run in 2012!|||As soon as we can find a gay/lesbian/African American/Illegal Hispanic American/woman. We just want to be sure we don't leave anyone out in this new Liberal demographic!|||The vast majority of African American's are Democrats, so statistically one would expect proportionally fewer African American candidates in the Republican Party. What I find strange is that there are so few African American Officials in the Democratic Party. We Republicans have Lynn Swann, Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, Clarence Thomas...
http://www.aarlc.org/index.asp
We Republicans have many excellent African American officials despite having a very small African American support base. Whereas Democrats have only 1 African American Senator despite having an ENORMOUS African American support base. When Democrats speak of equality, it is just empty rhetoric. It seems to me that Republicans are the only party where an African American can advance or fail without regard to the color of his or her skin. Of course, we are the party of Lincoln.|||Mary, obviously you only read the answers that support your blind hatred. Not sure what your agenda is, but try to be fair.
They had a GREAT candidate in Colin Powell - until they USED him to tell their lies about Iraq and destroyed his credibility totally.
Just like they have been USING Condi. I personally can't stand her, but she's just their "token" and with her they get two in one (black %26amp; female) - then they have her write a resolution and then tell her not to vote on it. (and of course she OBEYS)
I can see you don't spend much time around "Republicans". Their idea of "politically correct" is to let one in the room, they don't get to speak of course, but they let them in the room, what MORE do you want?
Truly, you don't expect them to ACTUALLY fraternize now do you?
How do you think Palin got where she got - an airhead, a not bad looking airhead token they would have used to get the WH, but do you think for one second she would have had a FRACTION of the power Cheney had? She was supposed to excite, help them win, and then go home and take care of her 5 kids. Why do you think they were so surprised that she didn't win the election for them? We were just supposed to LOOK at her and listen to the Rove BS, NOT actually interview her. Look, they gave us a FEMALE to vote for, it matters not that she didn't know her head from a hole in the ground, she was female that (in their small minds) should have taken the Hillary voters and clinched it for them.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
The party of the red-necked "superior" bigot with a person of color/female telling THEM what to do?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
ROFL, I just can't stop laughing.
Oh, to answer your question, not in our lifetime, or our childrens, or even our grandchildrens.
edit:
enter name here
Ya'll TWICE elected a white incompetant IDIOT that had NO command of the English language, why should HAVING command of the language stop a minority?|||Sure. Bobby Jindahl is right on target for 2012.|||They have,,,Republican Condi Rice, Secretary of State, she was the highest ranking black female in history before Obama.
Unlike the Democrats, Republicans prefer to elect according to ideals,experience,and accomplishments, rather then elect by race or gender.|||As soon as one comes along that has political views that are conservative.
Addition: I guess you could interpret "Conservative" to mean "Competent."|||I would prefer that our priorities would be a conservative, regardless of race.|||Yes they can and would have if Sec Rice would have ran.|||thompson and palin 2012|||Bobby Jindal will be that person in 2012|||I don't see that happening in the for see-able future.|||Retarded Idiot does not = White = Bush|||I like Condoleeza Rice.|||Did you miss the TIDAL WAVE of support we had for Condi Rice???
She DIDN'T WANT to be President.....a fact that O-sham-a must be VERY thankful for.
With her education, upbringing, experience, and credentials, she would be a SLAM DUNK winner (in my opinion).
We also like Michael Steele and I happen to like Dr. Alan Keyes because he is a Constitutional SCHOLAR.|||24 years after the Democrats ran a female Vice-President candidate the Republicans had Palin.
So I guess about another 24 years.|||Republicans don't elect people based on their skin color, there is no need to elect someone simply because they're not white. Rev. Wright isn't white but he's not right (not in the head anyway).|||I don't know...maybe Colin Powell...if they move more to the center.
I could consider voting for him.|||go to any republican gathering and you can count the non whites on one hand. The republican party is made up of all whites, while the democrats are all-inclusive. So which party is more inclusive? And a token black republican is just that--a token.|||When there is a competant one that wants to serve in such a position.... We don't just elect people of minorities for the sheer fact they are a part of a minority... Our political and election process should not be subject to affirmative action and that whomever has a color to their skin should be elected because they happened to master the English Language... :/
I would like to see Bobby Jindal go farther... as well as others... but they have to WANT to do it too...
BTW: I know more Mexicans and Hispanics that are Conservative and Republican than I know white people that are...|||WHO CARES what color someone is ? shouldnt we elect our president according to his qualifications and his beliefs? I thought we are not supposed to judge people on the color of their skin so the republicans should nominate the best person { black,white,male,female] for the job.|||HA HA HA HA|||who knows? who cares?
Today I deal with the here and now ~
added to next poster. bush was not competent. He is a warmonger. A man who believes himself to be God.
So there were no more attacks against the US ~ un hum
why not, you ask?
because of bush, you answer.
Not me.
Because you see, no one R~E~A~L~L~Y knows who was responsible for 911. but I will say this. There is no way that a big overgrown arab named Osama binLaden ~living in a cage, could have masterminded the exact timing, the preciseness, the too-well put together tragedies of 911. No way.|||As soon as the Democrats "elect" a competent leader.|||OK.....since a person's skin color is the most important attribute you look for when picking a leader......who does this? Oh yeah, Democrats.
Gotta love "progressives"......lol|||I hope to see Rice in that race next time. We will then have a women and she will be of color!|||Michael Steele will probably be the leader of the GOP very soon. Alan Keyes ran for President this year however the Democrats choose our candidate for us. You do realize 18 million Democrats voted against Obama in the Primaries don't you?|||I am personally a Colin Powell fan! I am really hoping to see him run in 2012!|||As soon as we can find a gay/lesbian/African American/Illegal Hispanic American/woman. We just want to be sure we don't leave anyone out in this new Liberal demographic!|||The vast majority of African American's are Democrats, so statistically one would expect proportionally fewer African American candidates in the Republican Party. What I find strange is that there are so few African American Officials in the Democratic Party. We Republicans have Lynn Swann, Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, Clarence Thomas...
http://www.aarlc.org/index.asp
We Republicans have many excellent African American officials despite having a very small African American support base. Whereas Democrats have only 1 African American Senator despite having an ENORMOUS African American support base. When Democrats speak of equality, it is just empty rhetoric. It seems to me that Republicans are the only party where an African American can advance or fail without regard to the color of his or her skin. Of course, we are the party of Lincoln.|||Mary, obviously you only read the answers that support your blind hatred. Not sure what your agenda is, but try to be fair.
What is a federal party leader?
can someone give me some names of federal party leaders and what party they represent?|||Like leaders in the Federal Government of the US?
Or leaders of the Federal Party?
Or leaders of the Federal Party?
What has Obama done as the party leader ?
so, this being one of the roles of the pres, i need it, and i can't find it anywhere /:
help me out ? oh, and can you guys give me a url too ?
please %26amp; thank you %26lt;3|||Leading the party and nation.|||He got his national health care reform bill passed and signed it into law, a few weeks ago.|||Well he has probably done as much as our Politicians do when they get the Power.... Zilch|||Troll, moron
help me out ? oh, and can you guys give me a url too ?
please %26amp; thank you %26lt;3|||Leading the party and nation.|||He got his national health care reform bill passed and signed it into law, a few weeks ago.|||Well he has probably done as much as our Politicians do when they get the Power.... Zilch|||Troll, moron
Explain TWO ways the presidents role as a party leader can make him a more effective legislative leader.?
Hand out the Pork.
Hand out the welfare.
Hand out the welfare.
Why did a Tea Party leader verbally abuse a Parkinson's victim?
Tea Baggers are the scum of this country.|||A credible question would have a credible link. This is the first I have heard of this latest rummer about the Tea Party. Answer: It didn't happen, this is a rummer (lies, falsification, fabrication) created by the far left to discredit the Tea Party. It seems that all the far left has to discredit the many millions that show up at Tea Parties is the malicious lies they fabricate in their own mind. From my viewpoint, it's a rather pathetic tactic.
.|||The "Tremorator" likely earned a good dressing down. Did you think that Parkinson's exempts one from assholedom? Oh, wait, was it you?|||Evidence? Links? Anything to demonstrate this is anything more than another liberal lie or setup? I'd say your question is unanswerable because the even you mention didn't happen.|||Equal opportunity abuse...No abuse left behind...Take your pick..|||Please provide a link to credible sources, with video and audio (that isn't You Tube) to support your belief that this actually happened. Thank you.|||Is there an audio or video of this slandering charge?
No?
Another long list of Liberal plants|||It's what they do.
.|||The "Tremorator" likely earned a good dressing down. Did you think that Parkinson's exempts one from assholedom? Oh, wait, was it you?|||Evidence? Links? Anything to demonstrate this is anything more than another liberal lie or setup? I'd say your question is unanswerable because the even you mention didn't happen.|||Equal opportunity abuse...No abuse left behind...Take your pick..|||Please provide a link to credible sources, with video and audio (that isn't You Tube) to support your belief that this actually happened. Thank you.|||Is there an audio or video of this slandering charge?
No?
Another long list of Liberal plants|||It's what they do.
What political parties are involved in this election, and who is the leader of each party?
(Candian election) Also if possible, what does each leader stand for?|||Conservative party: Stephen Harper
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
Liberal Party: St茅phane Dion
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
Bloc Qu茅b茅cois: Gilles Duceppe
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
NDP :Jack Layton
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
Green : Elizabeth May
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
The Conservative Party's move further towards the Bush-Reagan mix of free market economics with social conservatism makes the somewhat mercurial Liberals look more moderate, despite their own rightward drift. An emphasis on environmental issues has helped the Liberals downplay deep differences within the party on other key issues. The Greens, more fiscally conservative than most of their sister parties, also harbour significant left-right differences within their ranks. Similarly Bloc Qu茅b茅cois is united in its core cause, but considerably divided in other policy areas. In provinces where the NDP has governed in recent years, social spending cutbacks and other nods towards neoliberalism place the party today closer to where the Liberals were two decades ago.
http://www.politicalcompass.org/canada20鈥?/a>
Registered Political Parties and Parties Eligible for Registration with links to the leaders.
http://www.elections.ca/content.asp?sect鈥?/a>
Issues the main parties are running on.
http://www.craigmarlatt.com/canada/elect鈥?/a>|||Welcome. Thank you
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
Liberal Party: St茅phane Dion
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
Bloc Qu茅b茅cois: Gilles Duceppe
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
NDP :Jack Layton
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
Green : Elizabeth May
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/leade鈥?/a>
The Conservative Party's move further towards the Bush-Reagan mix of free market economics with social conservatism makes the somewhat mercurial Liberals look more moderate, despite their own rightward drift. An emphasis on environmental issues has helped the Liberals downplay deep differences within the party on other key issues. The Greens, more fiscally conservative than most of their sister parties, also harbour significant left-right differences within their ranks. Similarly Bloc Qu茅b茅cois is united in its core cause, but considerably divided in other policy areas. In provinces where the NDP has governed in recent years, social spending cutbacks and other nods towards neoliberalism place the party today closer to where the Liberals were two decades ago.
http://www.politicalcompass.org/canada20鈥?/a>
Registered Political Parties and Parties Eligible for Registration with links to the leaders.
http://www.elections.ca/content.asp?sect鈥?/a>
Issues the main parties are running on.
http://www.craigmarlatt.com/canada/elect鈥?/a>|||Welcome. Thank you
Report Abuse
Leader of the republican party of the USA?
Who is the leader of the republican party of the USA? What is their view of the recession?|||Mr. Steele
He sees the recession being made longer and harder by irresponsible economics that punish businesses that make the jobs. Excessive spending that will make the youth of America indebted before they even enter the work force.|||Michael Steele.
I'm sure he is not thrilled with the economy, no one is.|||Michael Steele - a BLACK man.
He views the recession as being worsened by the irresponsible spending going on and also the formidable tax increases that depress the economy and slow its growth|||Me, Sarah Palin.
and I do not have a view on the recession as that matter is too complicated for me to compute.|||michael steele is the GOP leader. i would check out the web site to get a first hand answer.|||I don't think they really have a leader,unless you think of someone with a lot of influence like Rush Limbaugh,or Michael Steele.Republicans and third parties such as the Libertarian Party believe the government should stay out of the economy.They believe in free market capitalism.|||GE, Proctor and Gamble, Bank of America, Wal-Mart, Betel, AT%26amp;T. etc.|||Archie Bunker? He and his wife Edith ["Dingbat"] will be just fine as leaders of the Republican Party.|||Currently, their are true conservatives running for all kinds of governor positions, senate seats, and house seats within the next few years.
The "current" leader is Micheal Steele.
However, a true conservative who understands conservative economic principles is going to win the Republican primary in 2012.
I'd say Peter Schiff/Ron Paul have the best chance of winning the Republican ticket in 2012.|||The leader of the republican party of the USA is GOD because we as conservatives live our lives morally and ethically they way all good Christian people should. We don't kill babies, we believe in teaching people to survive instead of debilitating them, we pray for those who have gotten lost because this is "one nation under GOD".|||Arlen Specter, Joe the Plumber, and Sarah Palin.
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought you asked, "Who are the latest to bail out of the GOP" and "who was the last VP Candidate who couldn't define the Bush Doctrine?"|||no one, that's fairly obvious.
He sees the recession being made longer and harder by irresponsible economics that punish businesses that make the jobs. Excessive spending that will make the youth of America indebted before they even enter the work force.|||Michael Steele.
I'm sure he is not thrilled with the economy, no one is.|||Michael Steele - a BLACK man.
He views the recession as being worsened by the irresponsible spending going on and also the formidable tax increases that depress the economy and slow its growth|||Me, Sarah Palin.
and I do not have a view on the recession as that matter is too complicated for me to compute.|||michael steele is the GOP leader. i would check out the web site to get a first hand answer.|||I don't think they really have a leader,unless you think of someone with a lot of influence like Rush Limbaugh,or Michael Steele.Republicans and third parties such as the Libertarian Party believe the government should stay out of the economy.They believe in free market capitalism.|||GE, Proctor and Gamble, Bank of America, Wal-Mart, Betel, AT%26amp;T. etc.|||Archie Bunker? He and his wife Edith ["Dingbat"] will be just fine as leaders of the Republican Party.|||Currently, their are true conservatives running for all kinds of governor positions, senate seats, and house seats within the next few years.
The "current" leader is Micheal Steele.
However, a true conservative who understands conservative economic principles is going to win the Republican primary in 2012.
I'd say Peter Schiff/Ron Paul have the best chance of winning the Republican ticket in 2012.|||The leader of the republican party of the USA is GOD because we as conservatives live our lives morally and ethically they way all good Christian people should. We don't kill babies, we believe in teaching people to survive instead of debilitating them, we pray for those who have gotten lost because this is "one nation under GOD".|||Arlen Specter, Joe the Plumber, and Sarah Palin.
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought you asked, "Who are the latest to bail out of the GOP" and "who was the last VP Candidate who couldn't define the Bush Doctrine?"|||no one, that's fairly obvious.
Ed milliband-shouldn't a party leader be able to speak fluently and clearly?
It might sound unfair, but it does make a difference.|||What you are saying is not unfair - it is 100% fact, and that is why David Milliband should have got the leadership. David is far superior than his brother in more ways than one.|||He is a good public speaker the difference is he is not copying anyone he is very intelligent that is why he won ,I supported his brother David but I now know why he won you should watch and see I am 99% behind him now, he is more Intelligent than David Cameron,watch the space.
Why would educated Americans think STEELE is republican party leader OVER RUSH-BO ?
Steele is just a puppy
scooted up to the mic
still with his learners permit on full
RUSH-BO THE GREAT is the MASTER CRAFT MAN .|||I TOTALLY agree with you!!!
Rush is the LEADER of your party and I'm GLAD that you are PROUD of that!!!|||My, isn;t that a clever post?|||Rush is just a blow hard, a rich blow hard, but a blow hard none the less. Steele is a figure head with no power, and no support from the extreme Republicans who have placed their faith in Caribou Barbie.|||Neither is, really.
Steele is the chairman of the RNC, and his job is to raise money, attract voters and get volunteers and sponsors for the next election.
Rush is a political commentator and advocate of conservatism and critic of liberalism.|||As a Democrat I couldn't be more please to know that Rush Limbaugh-a College drop out, took a plea bargain in the state of Florida after being arrested for drugs, and a Talk Show Host is the REAL leader of the Republican Party!
We saw how much "pull" he had in Nov.4 2008 election-I rest my case.|||Rush is a radio talk show host that lives for controversy no one can deny he is brilliant but the party elected Steele and believe me he is more seasoned then Obama ever was! Rush is a conservative and Steele is more a moderate and most republicans are moderates. Steele raises money for the RNC Rush is a talk show host big difference!
scooted up to the mic
still with his learners permit on full
RUSH-BO THE GREAT is the MASTER CRAFT MAN .|||I TOTALLY agree with you!!!
Rush is the LEADER of your party and I'm GLAD that you are PROUD of that!!!|||My, isn;t that a clever post?|||Rush is just a blow hard, a rich blow hard, but a blow hard none the less. Steele is a figure head with no power, and no support from the extreme Republicans who have placed their faith in Caribou Barbie.|||Neither is, really.
Steele is the chairman of the RNC, and his job is to raise money, attract voters and get volunteers and sponsors for the next election.
Rush is a political commentator and advocate of conservatism and critic of liberalism.|||As a Democrat I couldn't be more please to know that Rush Limbaugh-a College drop out, took a plea bargain in the state of Florida after being arrested for drugs, and a Talk Show Host is the REAL leader of the Republican Party!
We saw how much "pull" he had in Nov.4 2008 election-I rest my case.|||Rush is a radio talk show host that lives for controversy no one can deny he is brilliant but the party elected Steele and believe me he is more seasoned then Obama ever was! Rush is a conservative and Steele is more a moderate and most republicans are moderates. Steele raises money for the RNC Rush is a talk show host big difference!
Cameron has been to Poland and made friends with an anti semetic anti gay party leader.?
who is also a climate change denier and who regularly appears on an extreme right wing radio show presented by a holy man of some description who is a holocaust denier.
So who are you voting for?|||I don't let my friends influence my politics, so why should he be any different?|||Perhaps he will get some tips on how to eliminate Islam from Britain whilst he is there|||They're not really friends until they add each other on facebook.|||It sounds like the Tories will be getting more votes then.|||Cameron.|||Is this is the same David Cameron who said he regretted going to South Africa on a Tory funded fact finding mission to see how Apartheid really worked. A leopard doesn't change its spots.
You can judge a man by his friends - I am only surprised he hasn't visited America to appear on Micheal Savages radio show to offer support. There must be a photo opportunity and story there.
Anything to prevent him talking about the issues facing this country and what he will do about them.
The man is a joke - he has no morals, ethics or policies.|||Cameron|||All the Fascists of the world are drawn together eventually. Take a look back at the gradual erosion of civil liberties in Britain over the last 25 years. But do not be mistaken in thinking that the Tories have a monopoly on such matters. Tony Blair and his ilk were just as bad.
None of them give a toss about you or any other voter|||Doesn't surprise me really, there's not one of them in Westminster worth voting for, thankfully in Scotland we have the SNP so i'll be voting for them!|||Since we have had a decade of cooling temperatures despite a 25% increase in carbon emissions, it looks as if the Polish leader is correct on the climate change issue at least.
So who are you voting for?|||I don't let my friends influence my politics, so why should he be any different?|||Perhaps he will get some tips on how to eliminate Islam from Britain whilst he is there|||They're not really friends until they add each other on facebook.|||It sounds like the Tories will be getting more votes then.|||Cameron.|||Is this is the same David Cameron who said he regretted going to South Africa on a Tory funded fact finding mission to see how Apartheid really worked. A leopard doesn't change its spots.
You can judge a man by his friends - I am only surprised he hasn't visited America to appear on Micheal Savages radio show to offer support. There must be a photo opportunity and story there.
Anything to prevent him talking about the issues facing this country and what he will do about them.
The man is a joke - he has no morals, ethics or policies.|||Cameron|||All the Fascists of the world are drawn together eventually. Take a look back at the gradual erosion of civil liberties in Britain over the last 25 years. But do not be mistaken in thinking that the Tories have a monopoly on such matters. Tony Blair and his ilk were just as bad.
None of them give a toss about you or any other voter|||Doesn't surprise me really, there's not one of them in Westminster worth voting for, thankfully in Scotland we have the SNP so i'll be voting for them!|||Since we have had a decade of cooling temperatures despite a 25% increase in carbon emissions, it looks as if the Polish leader is correct on the climate change issue at least.
Liberals what do you make of the socialist party leader saying his agenda will be implemented under liberalism?
"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name of liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until one day America will be a Socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened. " -Norman Thomas|||Norman Thomas died in 1968, genius.
Propaganda fail.
**EDIT**
"pickles", you shouldn't make snide comments about other people's intelligence when your snippy little answer contains a glaring grammatical error. You may be silent.|||So, that's one guys opinion. I just think we are a better nation than one who let's people die from illness or starvation.
Andrew is right too.|||Osama Bin Laden also said that America is the devil. Since you take the word of other people, you must think Osama is right, too.|||I don't make anything out of it. I know what the platform of the left leaning candidates is and it has nothing to do with socialism. You need some rational thinking skills.|||Doesn't seem to know much about liberalism.|||I doubt american's can even understand most of those words.|||Deception will usher in a socialist order if we remain in a mode of not protecting and fighting for our freedom.Their unconstitutional behavior makes them domestic enemies of the Constitution, as such, they are an Outlaw Govt..
Any law written for the American Citizen must be Constitutional.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
"Every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution or the people, can be valid."
"We the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts--not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. Abraham Lincoln
"Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force." -- Thomas Jefferson
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government 鈥?lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. 鈥?Patrick Henry
"If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess
highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its
experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams*|||I'm sure you could say the same thing for Fascism, and Conservatism.|||They are blind sheep following the plan.|||Wishful thinking on his part. Like the Tea Party people predicting that the country will swing right, and the Yippies predicting a left wing revolution.
By the way, Norman Thomas was a long time ago.|||Just someone trying to make it appear they are more important than they really are.|||Republicans = Evil Nazi's
Propaganda fail.
**EDIT**
"pickles", you shouldn't make snide comments about other people's intelligence when your snippy little answer contains a glaring grammatical error. You may be silent.|||So, that's one guys opinion. I just think we are a better nation than one who let's people die from illness or starvation.
Andrew is right too.|||Osama Bin Laden also said that America is the devil. Since you take the word of other people, you must think Osama is right, too.|||I don't make anything out of it. I know what the platform of the left leaning candidates is and it has nothing to do with socialism. You need some rational thinking skills.|||Doesn't seem to know much about liberalism.|||I doubt american's can even understand most of those words.|||Deception will usher in a socialist order if we remain in a mode of not protecting and fighting for our freedom.Their unconstitutional behavior makes them domestic enemies of the Constitution, as such, they are an Outlaw Govt..
Any law written for the American Citizen must be Constitutional.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
"Every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution or the people, can be valid."
"We the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts--not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. Abraham Lincoln
"Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force." -- Thomas Jefferson
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government 鈥?lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. 鈥?Patrick Henry
"If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess
highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its
experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams*|||I'm sure you could say the same thing for Fascism, and Conservatism.|||They are blind sheep following the plan.|||Wishful thinking on his part. Like the Tea Party people predicting that the country will swing right, and the Yippies predicting a left wing revolution.
By the way, Norman Thomas was a long time ago.|||Just someone trying to make it appear they are more important than they really are.|||Republicans = Evil Nazi's
What happens if the Leader of a party does not win in his riding in a Canadian federal election?
For example. Harper's riding is Calgary South. What would happen If he were to loose and the liberal candidate won the seat in Calgary South but the Conservatives still won the majority seats in the country? Would Harper still remain Prime Minister even though he actually lost in the election? Would he take over another MPs seat from another riding? Or would he have to step down as leader and someone who won a seat would have to take over as Prime Minister?
Thanks!|||Yes, he would still be prime minister but there would be political pressure to find another seat. Someone can give up their seat so he could run again.|||You would think that he/she would get booted-out but NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Thanks!|||Yes, he would still be prime minister but there would be political pressure to find another seat. Someone can give up their seat so he could run again.|||You would think that he/she would get booted-out but NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Did you laugh too when the Tea Party Leader said his party was in the center?
The audience broke out in loud laughter when he said that.
http://www.tvsquad.com/2010/10/13/tea-pa鈥?/a>|||Yes. The center of the radical right-wing maybe|||Pay attention to the following list:
Boston Tea Party
Birthday Party
Halloween Party
House Party
New Years eve Party
Tea Party
Do you know what they all have in common? They all have the word party in them but are not organized political parties. Get it.
When ordinary citizens go to a Tea Party rally they are just average Americans concerned with out of control government spending, the rising national debt, and sticking our kids with the bill
Democrats dismissing these concerns by calling people racists, kooks, witches, NAZi's or Whores is offensive, condescending, and will cost the election|||Let me see if it's possible to put this in simple enough terms for you to understand.
%26gt; You and I are in a class together and we agree to sit in the center of the room.
%26gt; Obviously, we can't sit in the exact same spot so we pick the two chairs closest to the center.
%26gt; Later, you move up against the left wall and I stay in my original seat.
%26gt; You hear me tell someone I sit on the center of the room.
%26gt; You laugh and tell them I sit on the extreme right.|||What a biased interview! Colbert was trying to get laughs. Give the guy points for a lot of courage to voluntarily getting in front of an obviously hostile audience and trying to explain himself. Colbert obviously had no intention of being fair.
I might also ask if the 'laugh' prompter was lighting up.|||Almost as funny as when far left libs try to say 0bama is "right of center". Almost, but not quite. The Tea Party is slightly right of center...where the majority of Americans are, that is why they are so successful.|||Yeah, I saw that too. I got to say it made me laugh.
Personally, I don't know of any self-professed Tea Partiers but the people that they stood up as candidates are far from the center. The candidates are on the extreme.|||I've never met one who would ever, in any circumstance, vote democrat. If your default vote is for a Republican, then you are essentially a Republican even if you're not a party member. That is not centrist.|||Yes, I thought it was funny too. The TEA Party is a product of Fox News (Remember the FNC Tax Day Tea Party?). So to imagine that Fox News would promote any organization other than the far right is..... funny.|||The majority of Americans approve of the TEA party agenda--fiscal responsibility.
That makes them the center. You really need to keep up with the polls.|||Well, How do you explain TEA Party members beating out establishment Republicans in some of the primaries?
Thanks for playing, you fail.|||You really think Colbert's audience really watch the news? Most of them are braindead, and don't know who Joe Biden is.
And The Tea Party IS a Centrist Party.|||There is no leader of the tea party. Its grass roots
Edit Ron Paul started the tea party. And Colberts audience is just a bunch of morons|||Tea Party Leader. We have no leaders? What do you mean.|||That's how fanatics think. The Sith tea party think they're center and everybody else are are located to their left.|||what is hilarious is you think colbert is news worthy|||the center of American politics|||No but I laugh at your questions.|||I feel pity for the liberals...they really know not who they are nor what they really stand for.|||No, this is pretty lame- Tea party is center.|||I'm sure they seem extreme to people who regard Obama as a moderate.|||No, the audience on Colbert is as far left as we get in this country.|||I find it sad.|||liberals think that the center is to the right...sad|||LOL, I almost bust a gut.
http://www.tvsquad.com/2010/10/13/tea-pa鈥?/a>|||Yes. The center of the radical right-wing maybe|||Pay attention to the following list:
Boston Tea Party
Birthday Party
Halloween Party
House Party
New Years eve Party
Tea Party
Do you know what they all have in common? They all have the word party in them but are not organized political parties. Get it.
When ordinary citizens go to a Tea Party rally they are just average Americans concerned with out of control government spending, the rising national debt, and sticking our kids with the bill
Democrats dismissing these concerns by calling people racists, kooks, witches, NAZi's or Whores is offensive, condescending, and will cost the election|||Let me see if it's possible to put this in simple enough terms for you to understand.
%26gt; You and I are in a class together and we agree to sit in the center of the room.
%26gt; Obviously, we can't sit in the exact same spot so we pick the two chairs closest to the center.
%26gt; Later, you move up against the left wall and I stay in my original seat.
%26gt; You hear me tell someone I sit on the center of the room.
%26gt; You laugh and tell them I sit on the extreme right.|||What a biased interview! Colbert was trying to get laughs. Give the guy points for a lot of courage to voluntarily getting in front of an obviously hostile audience and trying to explain himself. Colbert obviously had no intention of being fair.
I might also ask if the 'laugh' prompter was lighting up.|||Almost as funny as when far left libs try to say 0bama is "right of center". Almost, but not quite. The Tea Party is slightly right of center...where the majority of Americans are, that is why they are so successful.|||Yeah, I saw that too. I got to say it made me laugh.
Personally, I don't know of any self-professed Tea Partiers but the people that they stood up as candidates are far from the center. The candidates are on the extreme.|||I've never met one who would ever, in any circumstance, vote democrat. If your default vote is for a Republican, then you are essentially a Republican even if you're not a party member. That is not centrist.|||Yes, I thought it was funny too. The TEA Party is a product of Fox News (Remember the FNC Tax Day Tea Party?). So to imagine that Fox News would promote any organization other than the far right is..... funny.|||The majority of Americans approve of the TEA party agenda--fiscal responsibility.
That makes them the center. You really need to keep up with the polls.|||Well, How do you explain TEA Party members beating out establishment Republicans in some of the primaries?
Thanks for playing, you fail.|||You really think Colbert's audience really watch the news? Most of them are braindead, and don't know who Joe Biden is.
And The Tea Party IS a Centrist Party.|||There is no leader of the tea party. Its grass roots
Edit Ron Paul started the tea party. And Colberts audience is just a bunch of morons|||Tea Party Leader. We have no leaders? What do you mean.|||That's how fanatics think. The Sith tea party think they're center and everybody else are are located to their left.|||what is hilarious is you think colbert is news worthy|||the center of American politics|||No but I laugh at your questions.|||I feel pity for the liberals...they really know not who they are nor what they really stand for.|||No, this is pretty lame- Tea party is center.|||I'm sure they seem extreme to people who regard Obama as a moderate.|||No, the audience on Colbert is as far left as we get in this country.|||I find it sad.|||liberals think that the center is to the right...sad|||LOL, I almost bust a gut.
Republicans and Democrats: What do you respect/admire most about your party's leader?
And who do you consider to be your party's leader?|||I believe it is Howard Dean at the moment and I like that he reasonable approach to things.|||My party leader is Rush Limbo, and I like his jet plane.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)